Interpreting the uncertainty of model-based and design-based estimation in downscaling estimates from NFI data: a case-study in Extremadura (Spain)

被引:7
|
作者
Guerra-Hernandez, Juan [1 ]
Botequim, Brigite [2 ]
Bujan, Sandra [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Jurado-Varela, Alfonso [6 ]
Alberto Molina-Valero, Juan [7 ]
Martinez-Calvo, Adela [7 ]
Perez-Cruzado, Cesar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Forest Res Ctr, Sch Agr, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] ForestWISE Collaborat Lab Integrated Forest & Fir, Vila Real, Portugal
[3] Univ Santiago Compostela, Dept Ingn Agroforestal, GI TB Biodiversidade LaboraTe 1934, Lugo, Spain
[4] Univ Santiago Compostela, IBADER, Lugo, Spain
[5] Univ Leon, Dept Tecnol Minera Topog & Estructuras, Ponferrada, Spain
[6] Serv Ordenac & Gest Forestal, Extremadura Forest Serv Junta Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
[7] Univ Santiago Compostela, Escuela Politecn Super Ingn, Dept Ingn Agroforestal, Sustainable Forest Management Unit UXFS, Lugo, Spain
关键词
LiDAR; mapping; model-based inference; design-based inference; uncertainty; Spanish national forest inventory (SNFI); ASSISTED ESTIMATION; FOREST; LIDAR; AIRBORNE; BIOMASS; LEVEL; STOCK; INFERENCE; LANDSAT; CARBON;
D O I
10.1080/15481603.2022.2051383
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Remotely sensed data are increasingly used together with National Forest Inventory (NFI) data to improve the spatial precision of forest variable estimates. In this study, we combined data from the 4th Spanish National Forest Inventory (SNFI-4) and from the 2nd nationwide Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) survey to develop predictive forest inventory variables (total over bark volume (V), basal area (G), and annual increase in total volume (IAVC)) and aboveground biomass (AGB) models for the eight major forest strata in the region of Extremadura that are included in the Spanish Forest Map (SFM). We generated maps at 25 m resolution by applying an area-based approach (ABA) and 758 sample plots measured with good positional accuracy within the SNFI-4 in Extremadura (Spain). Inventory performance is mainly influenced by spatial scale and vegetation structure. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of statistical inference methods that can characterize forest inventory variables and AGB uncertainty across multiple spatial scales and types of vegetation structure. Predictions at pixel level were used to produce county, provincial, and regional model-based estimates, which were then compared with design-based estimates at different scales for different types of forest. We developed and tested both methods for forested area (cover, 19,744.15 km(2)), one province (9126.78 km(2)), and two counties (1594.42 km(2) and 2076.76 km(2), respectively) in Extremadura. The resulting relative standard error (SE) for regional level forest type-specific model-based estimates of V, G, IAVC, and AGB ranged from 3.34%-14.46%, 3.22%-12.50%, 4.46%-16.67%, and 3.63%-12.58%, respectively. The performance of the model-based approach, as assessed by the relative SE, was similar to that of the design-based approach at regional and provincial levels. However, the precision of SNFI model-based estimates was higher than that of estimates based on only the plot observations in small areas (e.g. at county level). The standard errors (SE) for model-based inferences were stable across the different scales, while SNFI design-based errors were higher due to the small sample sizes available for small areas. The findings indicate that SNFI-model based maps could be used directly to estimate forest inventory variables and AGB in the major forest strata included in the Spanish Forest Map, leading to potentially large economic savings.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 704
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing the uncertainty of wildlife population abundance: model-based versus design-based estimates
    Bellier, Edwige
    Monestiez, Pascal
    Certain, Gregoire
    Chadoeuf, Joel
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 2013, 24 (07) : 476 - 488
  • [2] A note on design-based versus model-based variance estimation in stereology
    Hobolth, A
    Jensen, EBV
    [J]. ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2002, 34 (03) : 484 - 490
  • [3] HOW NEARLY CAN MODEL-BASED PREDICTION AND DESIGN-BASED ESTIMATION BE RECONCILED
    BREWER, KRW
    HANIF, M
    TAM, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 83 (401) : 128 - 132
  • [4] A Primer on Clustering of Forest Management Units for Reliable Design-Based Direct Estimates and Model-Based Small Area Estimation
    Georgakis, Aristeidis
    Gatziolis, Demetrios
    Stamatellos, Georgios
    [J]. FORESTS, 2023, 14 (10):
  • [5] Comparison of design-based and model-based estimates for tropical forestry resource with post-stratification
    Dessard, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (08) : 651 - 665
  • [6] DESIGN-BASED ESTIMATION OF FOREST VOLUME WITHIN A MODEL-BASED SAMPLE SELECTION FRAMEWORK
    SCHREUDER, HT
    WILLIAMS, MS
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1995, 25 (01): : 121 - 127
  • [7] Spatially-restricted random sampling designs for design-based and model-based estimation
    Stevens, DL
    Olsen, AR
    [J]. ACCURACY 2000, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 609 - 616
  • [8] DESIGN-BASED VERSUS MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF SPATIAL MEANS - THEORY AND APPLICATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL SCIENCE
    BRUS, DJ
    DEGRUIJTER, JJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 1993, 4 (02) : 123 - 152
  • [9] The Precision of C Stock Estimation in the Ludhikola Watershed Using Model-Based and Design-Based Approaches
    Chinembiri T.S.
    Bronsveld M.C.
    Rossiter D.G.
    Dube T.
    [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2013, 22 (4) : 297 - 309
  • [10] On comparing design-based estimation versus model-based prediction to assess the abundance of biological populations
    Aubry, Philippe
    Francesiaz, Charlotte
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144