Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark

被引:178
|
作者
Ladenburg, Jacob [1 ]
Dubgaard, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Environm Econ & Rural Dev Div, DK-1958 Fredericksberg C, Denmark
关键词
visual disamenities of offshore wind farms; choice experiments; willingness to pay;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Expansion of offshore wind power plays a significant role in the energy policies of many EU countries. However, offshore wind farms create visual disamenities. These disamenities can be reduced by siting wind farms at larger distances from the coast-and accepting higher costs per kWh produced. In this paper willingness to pay for reducing the visual disamenities from future offshore wind farms is elicited using the economic valuation method Choice Experiments. The valuation scenario comprises the location of 720 offshore wind turbines (equivalent to 3600 MW) in farms at distances equal to: 12, 18 or 50 km from the shore, relative to an 8 km baseline. Using a fixed effect logit model average willingness to pay amounts were estimated as: 46, 96 and 122 Euros/household/year for having the wind farms located at 12, 18 and 50 kin from the coast as opposed to 8 km. The results also reveal that WTP deviates significantly depending on the age of respondents and their experiences with offshore wind farms. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4059 / 4071
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heterogeneity in willingness to pay for the location of offshore wind power development: An application of the willingness to pay space model
    Ladenburg, Jacob
    Skotte, Maria
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 241
  • [2] Assessment of the visual impact of offshore wind farms
    Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora
    Papadopoulos, Stylianos
    Tsoutsos, Theocharis
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 190 : 358 - 370
  • [3] Distance to offshore wind farms, onshore wind power spillover relationships, and the willingness to pay for farshore, large-scale wind power development
    Ladenburg, Jacob
    Knapp, Lauren A.
    Petrovic, Stefan
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [4] The influence of stakeholder groups in operation and maintenance services of offshore wind farms: Lesson from Denmark
    Ahsan, Dewan
    Pedersen, Soren
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 125 : 819 - 828
  • [5] A Study of Efficiency in a Reduced Matrix Converter for Offshore Wind Farms
    Garces, Alejandro
    Molinas, Marta
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2012, 59 (01) : 184 - 193
  • [6] Evaluating a floating offshore wind farm: Households' willingness to pay in South Korea
    Hyun, Min-Ki
    Jin, Se-Jun
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 255
  • [7] Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience
    Ladenburg, Jacob
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (03) : 380 - 387
  • [8] VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS IN A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM
    Lopez Uriarte, Joaquin
    Diaz Severiano, Jose Andres
    Manchado del Val, Cristina
    Gomez-Jauregui, Valentin
    Guinda Salsamendi, Xabier
    Monteoliva Herreras, Agustin
    Otero Gonzalez, Cesar
    [J]. DYNA, 2019, 94 (06): : 643 - 649
  • [9] GREENER IS CHEAPER: AN EXAMPLE FROM OFFSHORE WIND FARMS
    Bhattacharya, Subhamoy
    Kammen, Dan
    [J]. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024,
  • [10] Wind power production from very large offshore wind farms
    Pryor, Sara C.
    Barthelmie, Rebecca J.
    Shepherd, Tristan J.
    [J]. JOULE, 2021, 5 (10) : 2663 - 2686