Stakeholder quantification and prioritisation research: A systematic literature review

被引:24
|
作者
Hujainah, Fadhl [1 ]
Abu Bakar, Rohani Binti [1 ]
Al-haimi, Basheer [2 ]
Abdulgabber, Mansoor Abdullateef [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fac Comp Syst & Software Engn, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fac Ind Management, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
关键词
Stakeholders quantification; Stakeholders prioritisation; Systematic review; REQUIREMENTS; IDENTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.infsof.2018.05.008
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context: Stakeholder quantification and prioritisation (SQP) is executed to quantify and prioritise stakeholders of the system based on their impacts. Selecting and involving the appropriate stakeholders are considered one of the major factors for producing a successful system. Objective: The objectives of this paper is to provide precise investigation regarding the SQP domain with respect to its impact on prioritising requirements, identifying SQP attributes, critically investigating the existing techniques, and presenting the challenges and recommended future works. Method: The systematic literature review (SLR) guidelines proposed by Kitchenham are adopted to guide the review process. The identified related studies underwent a rigorous study selection process. Thus, 31 out of 210 identified studies were selected as primary studies to address adequately the formulated research questions. Results: Findings demonstrate that SQP is a crucial process in requirement prioritisation (RP) because of its ability to identify stakeholders' impact on the systems requirements that lead to the production of a correctly prioritised list of requirements. Seventeen SQP attributes are revealed along with their description, usage impact, and degree of importance. Furthermore, nine techniques that focus on quantification and prioritisation of the stakeholders are identified and critically analysed in terms of their description, SQP process involved, SQP attributes used, types, and limitations. The findings reveal that these techniques face some challenges with respect to the lack of low-level implementation details, lack of automation and intelligence level, and heavy reliance on the involvement of experts. Conclusion: SQP has been extensively discussed in stakeholder analysis and requirement prioritisation domains. Based on the findings, a new intelligent solution is suggested to minimise the need for expert participation in conducting the SQP process along with proposing measurement criteria for the attributes used to evaluate the stakeholders. The deficiency of research works regarding the selection of SQP techniques is also observe d.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 99
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder management: a systematic literature review
    Pedrini, Matteo
    Ferri, Laura Maria
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 19 (01): : 44 - 59
  • [2] Stakeholder and merger and acquisition research: a structured literature review
    Segal, Simon
    Guthrie, James
    Dumay, Johannes
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (02): : 2935 - 2964
  • [3] Software Requirements Prioritisation: A Systematic Literature Review on Significance, Stakeholders, Techniques and Challenges
    Hujainah, Fadhl
    Abu Bakar, Rohani Binti
    Abdulgabber, Mansoor Abdullateef
    Zamli, Kamal Z.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 71497 - 71523
  • [4] Entanglement Quantification and Classification: A Systematic Literature Review
    Zhahir, Amirul Asyraf
    Shuhud, Mohd Ilias M.
    Mohd, Siti Munirah
    Idrus, Bahari
    Zainuddin, Hishamuddin
    Jan, Nurhidaya Mohamad
    Wahiddin, Mohamed Ridza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 13 (05) : 218 - 225
  • [5] Quantification of acromioplasty. Systematic review of the literature
    Lavignac, Pierre
    Lacroix, Paul-Maxime
    Billaud, Anselme
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2021, 107 (04)
  • [6] Stakeholder influence and local government performance: a systematic literature review
    Gomes, Ricardo Correa
    Osborne, Stephen P.
    Guarnieri, Patricia
    [J]. REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2020, 54 (03): : 448 - 467
  • [7] A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation
    Pacheco, Carla
    Garcia, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2012, 85 (09) : 2171 - 2181
  • [8] Sustainable Management Practices and Stakeholder Pressure: A Systematic Literature Review
    Haleem, Fazli
    Farooq, Sami
    Cheng, Yang
    Waehrens, Brian Vejrum
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [9] A Stakeholder-Specific View on Impact Sourcing-Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Future Research
    Nguyen, Thuy
    Beimborn, Daniel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [10] Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas
    Xia, Nini
    Zou, Patrick X. W.
    Griffin, Mark A.
    Wang, Xueqing
    Zhong, Rui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (05) : 701 - 715