To what extent do they sway Australian water management decision making?

被引:0
|
作者
Papas, Maureen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Fac Law, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
RESOURCES;
D O I
10.5194/piahs-374-23-2016
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
At a time when the reliability of freshwater resources has become highly unpredictable, as a result of climate change and increased droughts frequency, the role of scientific evidence in forecasting the availability of seasonal water has become more critical. Australia is one of the driest inhabited continents. Its freshwater availability is highly variable, which poses unique problems for the management of the nation's water resources. Under Australia's federal system, water management challenges have been progressively dealt with through political institutions that rely on best available science to inform policy development. However, it could be argued that evidenced-based policy making is an impossible aim in a highly complex and uncertain political environment: that such a rational approach would be defeated by competing values and vested interests across stakeholders. This article demonstrates that, while science has a fundamental role to play in effective water resource management, the reality on the ground often diverges from the intended aim and does not always reflect efforts at reform. This article briefly reviews the Water Act 2007 (Cth) and comments on why policy makers need to manage rather than try to eliminate uncertainty to promote change.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHAT TO DO AFTER MAKING A DECISION
    MRESCHAR, RI
    [J]. FOLIA HUMANISTICA, 1984, 22 (253) : 127 - 129
  • [2] Dynamic decision making: what do people do?
    John D. Hey
    Luca Panaccione
    [J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2011, 42 : 85 - 123
  • [3] Dynamic decision making: what do people do?
    Hey, John D.
    Panaccione, Luca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2011, 42 (02) : 85 - 123
  • [4] Do consultants do what they say they do? Observational study of the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process
    Driever, Ellen M.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Brand, Paul L. P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [5] Australian water decision making: are politicians performing?
    Horne, James
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 36 (2-3) : 462 - 483
  • [6] The unknown in decision making - What to do about it
    Ozdemir, Mujgan S.
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) : 349 - 359
  • [7] To what extent do decision aids for prenatal screening and diagnosis address involvement of partners in decision-making?-An environmental scan
    Severijns, Y.
    van der Linden, H.
    De Die-Smulders, C. E. M.
    Hoving, C.
    Jansen, J.
    van Osch, L. A. D. M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (12) : 2952 - 2962
  • [8] Shared Decision Making for Common Surgical Conditions: What Do Management Guidelines Suggest?
    Nodoushani, Ariana Y.
    Sacks, Olivia A.
    O'Brien, Mollie A.
    Sanchez, Sabrina E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : E52 - E52
  • [9] Medical Decision Making: What Do We Trust?
    Cook, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (04) : 282 - 283
  • [10] Medical Decision Making: What Do We Trust?
    David A. Cook
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2010, 25 : 282 - 283