A predictive Markov decision process for optimizing inspection and maintenance strategies of partially observable multi-state systems

被引:23
|
作者
Guo, Chunhui [1 ]
Liang, Zhenglin [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, 1 Tsinghua Garden, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-state system; Markov processes; Decision making; Inspection; Maintenance; DETERIORATING STRUCTURES; POLICIES; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2022.108683
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Optimizing both inspection and maintenance strategies for multi-state systems is challenging, especially when the inspected conditions contain uncertainties. One classic approach for addressing this issue is the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP). However, the POMDP often considers the system is periodically inspected, resulting in a waste of inspection resources (cost and manpower) in the early stage of the system. To predictively optimize the inspection strategies, we formulate a new model-Predictive Markov Decision Process (PMDP). It extends the POMDP by embedding the Forward algorithm for inspection timing prediction and the Baum-Welch algorithm for model parameters estimation. Therefore, it could harvest the inspection information for predicting the successive inspection timing in an online updating scheme based on the new observation. In this manner, maintenance actions can take place at the predicted inspection timing that reduces unnecessary inspections. The PMDP manifests the power of predictive maintenance. As illustrated by the case study, the PMDP outperforms the POMDP under routine inspection by saving 26.3% of the cost on average.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A partially observable Markov decision process model for bridge inspection and maintenance
    Ellis, H
    Corotis, RB
    Jiang, MX
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY: CIVIL ENGINEERING RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS, VOL 3 - FINAL REPORT, 1996, : 1523 - 1528
  • [2] Predictive Maintenance Using GPU-accelerated Partially Observable Markov Decision Process
    Sharma, Naman
    Tham, Chen-Khong
    2019 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS (ICPADS), 2019, : 769 - 773
  • [3] A generalised partially observable Markov decision process updated by decision trees for maintenance optimisation
    Faddoul, Rafic
    Raphael, Wassim
    Chateauneuf, Alaa
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2011, 7 (10) : 783 - 796
  • [4] Robust partially observable Markov decision process
    Osogami, Takayuki
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 37, 2015, 37 : 106 - 115
  • [5] Maintenance Decision-Making Using a Continuous-State Partially Observable Semi-Markov Decision Process
    Zhou, Yifan
    Ma, Lin
    Mathew, Joseph
    Sun, Yong
    Wolff, Rodney
    2010 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2010, : 322 - +
  • [6] A Markov decision process framework for optimal operation of monitored multi-state systems
    Compare, Michele
    Marelli, Paolo
    Baraldi, Piero
    Zio, Enrico
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2018, 232 (06) : 677 - 689
  • [7] Maintenance strategy optimization using a continuous-state partially observable semi-Markov decision process
    Zhou, Yifan
    Ma, Lin
    Mathew, Joseph
    Sun, Yong
    Wolff, Rodney
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2011, 51 (02) : 300 - 309
  • [8] A Corrosion Maintenance Model Using Continuous State Partially Observable Markov Decision Process for Oil and Gas Pipelines
    Wari, Ezra
    Zhu, Weihang
    Lim, Gino
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (07)
  • [9] State Estimation for Mobile Robot using Partially Observable Markov Decision Process
    Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-22-1, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo
    106, Japan
    J. Rob. Mechatronics, 3 (272-277):
  • [10] A two-state partially observable Markov decision process with three actions
    Ben-Zvi, Tal
    Chernonog, Tatyana
    Avinadav, Tal
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (03) : 957 - 967