GnRH antagonist improved blastocyst quality and pregnancy outcome after multiple failures of IVF/ICSI-ET with a GnRH agonist protocol

被引:36
|
作者
Takahashi, K
Mukaida, T
Tomiyama, T
Goto, T
Oka, C
机构
[1] Hiroshima HART Clin, Naka Ku, Hiroshima 7300051, Japan
[2] Osaka HART Clin, Kita Ku, Osaka 5300001, Japan
[3] Tokyo HART Clin, Shibuya Ku, Tokyo 1500011, Japan
关键词
blastocyst; GnRH agonist; GnRH antagonist; multiple ET failures;
D O I
10.1023/B:JARG.0000045470.68525.a4
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: To determine the efficacy of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone( GnRH) antagonist, cetrorelix, in improving the quality of embryos and pregnancy outcome, we performed a study in patients with a history of multiple failures of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) long protocol. Methods: Forty women with no live births after conventional IVF or ICSI embryo transfer (ET) and subsequent blastocyst transfer (BT) with a GnRHa long protocol entered this study. The treatment protocol consisted of a daily dose of clomiphene citrate 100 mg for 5 days and gonadotrophin injections daily from cycle day 4 onward. Cetrorelix, 0.25 mg/day, was started when the leading follicle reached 14 mm. Induction of ovulation was triggered with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (N=36) or GnRHa (N=4). It was possible to perform BT in 38 patients. Results: Comparison of the results with the results for BT with the previous GnRHa protocol showed no significant differences in number of oocytes retrieved or the zygote- and blastocyst-development rate. With the cetrorelix protocol, however, number of patients whose embryos had developed to at least one expanded blastocyst on day 5 was significantly higher than with the GnRHa protocol (25 vs. 9) (p<0.001), and 16 of the women became pregnant (42.1%), with 7 delivering 9 infants, 4 ending in abortion (25%), and 5 in progressing. Conclusions: The use of a GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation improves the outcome of pregnancy of patients with a history of multiple failure of IVF/ICSI-ET in a GnRHa protocol, most likely due to improvement of the quality of the blastocysts generated.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 322
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GnRH Antagonist Improved Blastocyst Quality and Pregnancy Outcome After Multiple Failures of IVF/ICSI–ET with a GnRH Agonist Protocol
    Katsuhiko Takahashi
    Tetsunori Mukaida
    Tatsuhiro Tomiyama
    Tetsuya Goto
    Chikahiro Oka
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2004, 21 : 317 - 322
  • [2] Controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist in patients with IVF and ICSI after TESE
    Schill, T
    Felberbaum, R
    Al-Hasani, S
    Bals-Pratsch, M
    Diedrich, K
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 : 319 - 319
  • [3] GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase does not increase clinical pregnancy or implantation rates following ICSI-ET in GnRH agonist or antagonist treated ovarian stimulation cycles
    Ata, B.
    Yakin, K.
    Balaban, B.
    Urman, B.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S163 - S163
  • [4] Pregnancy outcome in delayed start antagonist versus microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: An RCT
    Davar, Robab
    Neghab, Nosrat
    Naghshineh, Elham
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 16 (04) : 255 - 260
  • [5] 1500 IU hCG secures a normal clinical pregnancy outcome in IVF/ICSI GnRH antagonist cycles in which ovulation was triggered with a GnRH agonist
    Humaidan, P.
    Bredkjaer, H. Ejdrup
    Westergaard, L.
    Andersen, C. Yding
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I81 - I81
  • [6] The effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist protocol on folliculogenesis in IVF/ICSI
    Mochtar, MH
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (08) : 1713 - 1718
  • [7] Estradiol pretreatment in GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment
    Zhu, Shaomi
    Lv, Zhexi
    Song, Linjiang
    Zhang, Qinxiu
    Fan, Yiyue
    Li, Junjun
    [J]. OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (01): : 1811 - 1820
  • [8] GnRH agonist stop antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in ovarian poor responders undergoing IVF
    Khezri, Atefeh
    Kashani, Ladan
    Moini, Ashraf
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Yamini, Nazila
    Ataee, Mina
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2022, 17 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [9] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET)
    Raffaella Depalo
    K Jayakrishan
    Gabriella Garruti
    Ilaria Totaro
    Mariantonietta Panzarino
    Francesco Giorgino
    Luigi E Selvaggi
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 10
  • [10] Dual triggering with GnRH agonist plus hCG versus triggering with hCG alone for IVF/ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist cycles
    Chen, C. H.
    Tzeng, C. R.
    Wang, P. H.
    Liu, W. M.
    Chang, H. Y.
    Chen, H. H.
    Chen, C. H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 310 - 310