3D-printed, patient-specific DIEP flap templates for preoperative planning in breast reconstruction: a prospective case series

被引:12
|
作者
Chae, Michael P. [1 ,2 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Ru Dee [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Julian A. [1 ,2 ]
Rozen, Warren Matthew [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Monash Hlth, Dept Surg,Monash Med Ctr, Level 5,Block, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Grp, Peninsula Clin Sch, Peninsula Hlth, Frankston, Vic 3199, Australia
关键词
3D printing; surgical template; deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP); autologous breast reconstruction; preoperative planning; ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; PRINCIPLES; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES; MODELS;
D O I
10.21037/gs-21-263
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modern imaging technologies, such as computed tomographic angiography (CTA), can be useful for preoperative assessment in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap surgery. Planning perforator flap design can lead to improved surgical efficiency. However, current imaging modalities are limited by being displayed on a two-dimensional (2D) surface. In contrast, a 3D-printed model provides tactile feedback that facilitates superior understanding. Hence, we have 3D-printed patient-specific deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) templates, in an affordable and convenient manner, for preoperative planning. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing 25 immediate or delayed post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis (MS-TRAM) flaps are recruited prospectively. Using free, open-source softwares (3D Slicer, Autodesk MeshMixer, and Cura) and desktop 3D printers (Ultimaker 3E and Moment), we created a template based on a patient's abdominal wall anatomy from CTA, with holes and lines indicating the position of perforators, their intramuscular course and the DIEA pedicle. Results: The mean age of patients was 52 [38-67]. There were 15 immediate and 10 delayed reconstructions. 3D printing time took mean 18 hours and 123.7 g of plastic filament, which calculates to a mean material cost of AUD 8.25. DIEP templates accurately identified the perforators and reduced intraoperative perforator identification by 7.29 minutes (P=0.02). However, the intramuscular dissection time was not affected (P=0.34). Surgeons found the template useful for preoperative marking (8.6/10) and planning (7.9/10), but not for intramuscular dissection (5.9/10). There were no immediate flap-related complications. Conclusions: Our 3D-printed, patient-specific DIEP template is accurate, significantly reduces intraoperative perforator identification time and, hence, may be a useful tool for preoperative planning in autologous breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:2192 / 2199
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Liver Model for Preoperative Planning
    Madurska, Marta J.
    Poyade, Matthieu
    Eason, David
    Rea, Paul
    Watson, Angus J. M.
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2017, 24 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [2] Secondary Mandibular Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Implant
    Neha Sharma
    Harsimran Singh
    Anish Goyal
    Mandeep Singh Malhotra
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2024, 23 : 258 - 260
  • [3] Secondary Mandibular Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Implant
    Sharma, Neha
    Singh, Harsimran
    Goyal, Anish
    Malhotra, Mandeep Singh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024, 23 (02): : 258 - 260
  • [4] Patient-specific 3D-printed glioblastomas
    Gomez-Roman, Natividad
    Chalmers, Anthony J.
    [J]. NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 3 (07) : 498 - 499
  • [5] Patient-specific 3D-printed glioblastomas
    Natividad Gomez-Roman
    Anthony J. Chalmers
    [J]. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 3 : 498 - 499
  • [6] A novel 3D-printed scaffold for patient-specific partial breast reconstruction: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial
    Hou, Lan
    Yan, Changjiao
    Zhang, Mingkun
    Yang, Liu
    Wang, Zhe
    Qin, Yuan
    Meng, Zijie
    Yao, Qing
    Ling, Rui
    He, Jiankang
    Zhang, Juliang
    Zhang, Huan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [7] Development of Life-Size Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Dural Venous Models for Preoperative Planning
    Govsa, Figen
    Karakas, Asli Beril
    Ozer, Mehmet Asim
    Eraslan, Cenk
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 110 : E141 - E149
  • [8] Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction
    Steffen, Claudius
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Willsch, Magdalena
    Soares, Ana Prates
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Heiland, Max
    Kreutzer, Kilian
    Huber, Gerd
    Rendenbach, Carsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2023, 140
  • [9] 3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics
    Wong, Kwok Chuen
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2016, 8 : 57 - 66
  • [10] A Systematic Approach for Making 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Implants for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction
    Du, Ruxu
    Su, Yu-Xiong
    Yan, Yu
    Choi, Wing Shan
    Yang, Wei-Fa
    Zhang, Chunyu
    Chen, Xianshuai
    Curtin, Justin Paul
    Ouyang, Jianglin
    Zhang, Bitao
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (11) : 1291 - 1301