Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica

被引:123
|
作者
Dahm, Kristin Thuve [1 ]
Brurberg, Kjetil G. [1 ]
Jamtvedt, Gro [1 ]
Hagen, Kare Birger [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Natl Resource Ctr Rehabil Rheumatol, N-0319 Oslo, Norway
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; TRIAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007612.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Acute low-back pain (LBP) is a common reason to consult a general practitioner. Debate continues on the comparative effectiveness of advice on bed rest and staying active as part of the primary care management. Objectives To determine the effects of advice to rest in bed or stay active for patients with acute low-back pain or sciatica. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Back Review Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sport, and SCISEARCH to May 2009, reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted authors of relevant articles. Selection criteria Randomised trials of the effectiveness of advice to stay active or rest in bed for patients with acute LBP or sciatica. The main outcomes were pain, functional status, recovery and return to work. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently selected trials, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The trials were combined qualitatively or statistically, depending on data availability and presentation. Main results We included ten RCTs with varying risk of bias. For patients with acute LBP, results from two trials (N = 401) suggest small improvements in pain relief (SMD 0.22 (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.41) and functional status (SMD 0.29 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.49) in favour of advice to stay active. For patients with sciatica, there is moderate quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief (SMD -0.03 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.18)) or functional status (SMD 0.19 (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.41)), between advice to rest in bed or stay active. Low quality evidence (3 RCTs, N = 931) suggests little or no difference between exercises, advice to rest in bed or stay active for patients with acute LBP. Low quality evidence (1 RCT, N = 250) suggests little or no difference between physiotherapy, advice to rest in bed or stay active for patients with sciatica. No trials that compared different ways of delivering advice. Authors' conclusions Moderate quality evidence shows that patients with acute LBP may experience small benefits in pain relief and functional improvement from advice to stay active compared to advice to rest in bed; patients with sciatica experience little or no difference between the two approaches. Low quality evidence suggests little or no difference between those who received advice to stay active, exercises or physiotherapy. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on the estimate of effect and is likely to change our confidence in it.
引用
收藏
页数:66
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain
    Waddell, G
    Feder, G
    Lewis, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1997, 47 (423): : 647 - 652
  • [2] Bed rest for acute low-back pain and sciatica
    Hagen, Kare Birger
    Hilde, Gunvor
    Jamtvedt, Gro
    Winnem, Michael
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (06):
  • [3] Comparison of Physician's Advice for Non-specific Acute Low Back Pain in Japanese Workers: Advice to Rest Versus Advice to Stay Active
    Matsudaira, Ko
    Hara, Nobuhiro
    Arisaka, Mayumi
    Isomura, Tatsuya
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2011, 49 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [4] Review: Bed rest is not effective for acute low-back pain or sciatica - Commentary
    Pfeifer, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (05): : 789 - 789
  • [5] The Cochrane review of advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica
    Hagen, KB
    Hilde, G
    Jamtvedt, G
    Winnem, MF
    [J]. SPINE, 2002, 27 (16) : 1736 - 1741
  • [6] The cochrane review of bed rest for acute low back pain and sciatica
    Hagen, KB
    Hilde, G
    Jamtvedt, G
    Winnem, MF
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) : 2932 - 2939
  • [7] The effect of the stay active advice on physical activity and on the course of acute severe low back pain
    Olaya-Contreras, Patricia
    Styf, Jorma
    Arvidsson, Daniel
    Frennered, Karin
    Hansson, Tommy
    [J]. BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 7 (01):
  • [8] The effect of the stay active advice on physical activity and on the course of acute severe low back pain
    Patricia Olaya-Contreras
    Jorma Styf
    Daniel Arvidsson
    Karin Frennered
    Tommy Hansson
    [J]. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 7 (1)
  • [9] Measuring the contribution of pharmacological treatment to advice to stay active in patients with subacute low-back pain: a randomised controlled trial
    Rossignol, M
    Allaert, FA
    Rozenberg, S
    Valat, JP
    Avouac, B
    Peres, G
    Le Teuff, G
    Bannwarth, B
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (12) : 861 - 867
  • [10] LOW-BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA IN BUSSELTON
    HAY, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1976, 58 (02): : 258 - 258