Benchmarking of farms with automated milking systems in Canada and associations with milk production and quality

被引:14
|
作者
Matson, R. D. [1 ]
King, M. T. M. [1 ]
Duffield, T. F. [2 ]
Santschi, D. E. [3 ]
Orsel, K. [4 ]
Pajor, E. A. [4 ]
Penner, G. B. [5 ]
Mutsvangwa, T. [5 ]
DeVries, T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Lactanet, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3R4, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Fac Vet Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[5] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Anim & Poultry Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
关键词
robotic milking systems; housing; management; production; LACTATING DAIRY-CATTLE; SOMATIC-CELL COUNTS; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; COW BEHAVIOR; FREE-STALL; LAMENESS; HEALTH; HERDS; YIELD; BARNS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2020-20065
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to benchmark the herd-level housing and management strategies of automated milking system (AMS) farms across Canada and assess the associations of these herd-level housing factors and management practices with milk production and quality. Canadian AMS farms (n = 197; Western Canada: n = 50, Ontario: n = 77, Quebec: n = 59, Atlantic Canada: n = 11) were each visited once from April to September 2019, and details were collected related to barn design and herd management practices. Milk-recording data for the 6 mo before farm visits were collected. Farms averaged (+/- standard deviation) 110 +/- 102 lactating cows, 2.4 +/- 1.9 AMS units/farm, 47.5 +/- 14.9 cows/AMS, 36.7 +/- 5.0 kg/d of milk, 4.13 +/- 0.34% fat, 3.40 +/- 0.16% protein, and a herd-average somatic cell count of 186,400 +/- 80,800 cells/mL. Farms mainly used freestall housing systems (92.5%), organic bedding substrates (73.6%), and free flow cow traffic systems (87.8%); farms predominantly milked Holsteins (90.4%). Multivariable regression models were used to associate herd-level housing factors and management practices with milk production and quality. At the herd level, feed push-up frequency (mean = 12.8 +/- 8.3 times per day) and feed bunk space (mean = 64 +/- 21.5 cm/ cow) were positively associated with milk yield. Greater milk yield was associated with herds using inorganic (sand) versus organic bedding, milking Holsteins versus non-Holsteins, and using a form of mechanical ventilation versus natural ventilation alone. Milk fat and milk protein content were only associated with breed. Herds with lower somatic cell counts had more frequent alley cleaning (mean = 12.1 +/- 7.5 times per day), wider lying alleys (mean = 304.5 +/- 40.0 cm), and sand bedding. The results highlight the importance of using sand bedding, using mechanical ventilation, keeping feed pushed up, ensuring alleys are clean, and ensuring adequate space at the feed bunk for maintaining herd level productivity and milk quality in farms with AMS.
引用
收藏
页码:7971 / 7983
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Milk quality on Danish farms with automatic milking systems
    Rasmussen, MD
    Bjerring, M
    Justesen, P
    Jepsen, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (11) : 2869 - 2878
  • [2] Farm-level nutritional factors associated with milk production and milking behavior on Canadian farms with automated milking systems
    Van Soest, B. J.
    Matson, R. D.
    Santschi, D. E.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Steele, M. A.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Penner, G. B.
    Mutsvangwa, T.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (07) : 4409 - 4425
  • [3] Farm-level factors associated with lameness prevalence, productivity, and milk quality in farms with automated milking systems
    Matson, R. D.
    King, M. T. M.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Santschi, D. E.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Penner, G. B.
    Mutsvangwa, T.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (01) : 793 - 806
  • [4] Survey of milk quality on US dairy farms utilizing automatic milking systems
    Helgren, J. M.
    Reinemann, D. J.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2006, 49 (02) : 551 - 556
  • [5] Associations of milk production and quality with management and housing of robotic milking herds.
    Matson, R. D.
    King, M. T. M.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Santschi, D. E.
    Orsel, K.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Penner, G. B.
    Mutsvangwa, T.
    DeVries, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 239 - 239
  • [6] Associations between milking technology, herd size and milk production parameters on commercial dairy cattle farms
    Ivanyos, Dorottya
    Monostori, Attila
    Nemeth, Csaba
    Fodor, Istvan
    Ozsvari, Laszlo
    [J]. MLJEKARSTVO, 2020, 70 (02): : 103 - 111
  • [7] The association between milking interval and milk production per visit, milk fat, and milk protein of cows housed in free-flow automated milking system farms.
    Peiter, M.
    Salfer, J. A.
    Endres, M. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 54 - 54
  • [8] Impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cattle producers' reports of milking labour management, milk production and milk quality
    Tse, C.
    Barkema, H. W.
    DeVries, T. J.
    Rushen, J.
    Pajor, E. A.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (12) : 2649 - 2656
  • [9] Quality milk production: Milking practices and procedures
    Johnson, AP
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, VOL 8, 1996, 8 : 349 - 354
  • [10] Management systems with extended milking intervals in ruminants: Regulation of production and quality of milk
    Marnet, P. G.
    Komara, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (13) : 47 - 56