Water use of a biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China: A combination of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Zhu, Yuli [1 ,3 ]
Liang, Ji [1 ,3 ]
Yang, Qing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Hewen [1 ,3 ]
Peng, Kun [5 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, China EU Inst Clean & Renewable Energy, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Univ, John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Dept New Energy Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water footprint analysis; Life cycle assessment; Second generation biomass; Biomass direct-combustion power generation; Water footprint intensity; Water management; CORN-ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; MILLING FACTORIES; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY; CONSUMPTION; BLUE; BIOENERGY; GREEN; BIOETHANOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109396
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomass combustion for power generation plays an important role in achieving 1.5 degrees C climate target and fulfilling global energy demand, while putting pressure on global water resources. Confronted with severe water shortage, it is imperative to understand its comprehensive impact on water resource. Recently remarkable advances of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis have been witnessed in this field. Based on a review of the two methods' history, we propose a combination evaluation framework and define an associated indicators set to integrate both methods' advantages. By methods integration, direct and indirect water use are combined with the green, blue, and gray water footprint to describe the water use in detail. Furthermore, the life cycle water footprint of a typical biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China is evaluated based on the combined method. Results show the system life cycle water use is 11.71 L/MJ, while agricultural plantation accounts for the major part (84.61%). In addition, direct green water footprint is the largest component (46.54%), while direct and indirect blue water footprints account for 36.59% and 1.74%, respectively; indirect gray water footprint is 1.771 L/MJ. In terms of water use intensity, the direct-combustion power generation is lower than bio-oil power generation, but far more than solar photovoltaic and wind power. Sensitivity analysis suggests that improving power generation efficiency, straw collection coefficient and cultivating high water-efficient crops can evidently contribute to alleviating water stress conditions for bioenergy production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
    Zhu, Yongnan
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Haihong
    He, Guohua
    Li, Lei
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 254
  • [2] Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
    Zhu, Yongnan
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Haihong
    He, Guohua
    Li, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254
  • [3] Life cycle water footprint of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China
    Yang, Lai
    Chen, Hongbo
    Li, Hao
    Feng, Ye
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (33) : 80442 - 80461
  • [4] Life cycle water footprint of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China
    Lai Yang
    Hongbo Chen
    Hao Li
    Ye Feng
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 80442 - 80461
  • [5] Life cycle water footprint analysis of crop production in China
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Ji, Changxing
    Bai, Yueyang
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 256
  • [6] Life cycle water footprint assessment of concrete production in Northwest China
    Ding, Chao
    Dong, Wenxiu
    Zhang, Ailin
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Zhao, Na
    Chen, Rong
    Fu, Hanliang
    [J]. WATER POLICY, 2021, 23 (05) : 1211 - 1229
  • [7] Life cycle water footprint analysis for second-generation biobutanol
    Li, Guang
    Ma, Shuqi
    Xue, Xiaoxiao
    Yang, Shicheng
    Liu, Fan
    Zhang, Yulong
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 333
  • [8] Life cycle water use of a biomass-based pyrolysis polygeneration system in China
    Yang, Qing
    Liang, Ji
    Li, Jiashuo
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 224 : 469 - 480
  • [9] Environmental impact analysis of biomass power generation system based on life cycle assessment
    Lin, Lin
    Zhao, Daiqing
    Li, Li
    [J]. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2008, 29 (05): : 618 - 623
  • [10] Complementarities of Water-Focused Life Cycle Assessment and Water Footprint Assessment
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    Vionnet, Samuel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (21) : 11926 - 11927