Policy and Precinct: Citizen Evaluations and Electoral Confidence

被引:20
|
作者
King, Bridgett A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
VOTER IDENTIFICATION; PRESIDENTIAL-ELECTION; POLITICAL TRUST; POLL WORKERS; PARTICIPATION; REQUIREMENTS; PARTISANSHIP; AMERICANS; DEMOCRACY; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/ssqu.12303
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Objective. The objective of this research is to evaluate the role of state policy and election precinct evaluations on citizen confidence in individual and nationwide electoral outcomes. Methods. Utilizing the 2012 Survey and Performance of American Elections (SPAE) and data from the National Conference of State Legislatures, a series of ordered logistic regression models and probability estimates are presented. Results. Evaluations of voting precincts, specifically poll workers, polling locations, and voting machines have an effect on electoral confidence. Confidence, however, is not consistent. Racial identification and partisan affiliation continue to shape citizen confidence in American elections. Voter identification requirements, outside of racial considerations, do not affect confidence in individual or nationwide ballot outcomes. Conclusions. The administration of American elections effects citizen confidence in electoral outcomes. Reforms in this area have the capacity to improve citizen confidence, trust, and potentially political participation.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 689
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Candidate Confidence and Electoral Appeal: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Nonverbal Confidence on Voter Evaluations
    Dumitrescu, Delia
    Gidengil, Elisabeth
    Stolle, Dietlind
    POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2015, 3 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [2] Citizens' Policy Confidence and Electoral Punishment: A Neglected Dimension of Electoral Accountability
    Gerber, Alan S.
    Huber, Gregory A.
    Doherty, David
    Dowling, Conor M.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2011, 73 (04): : 1206 - 1224
  • [3] Citizen Assessment of Electoral Reforms: Do Evaluations of Fairness Blunt Self-Interest?
    Biggers, Daniel R.
    Bowler, Shaun
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 44 (01) : 435 - 454
  • [4] Citizen Assessment of Electoral Reforms: Do Evaluations of Fairness Blunt Self-Interest?
    Daniel R. Biggers
    Shaun Bowler
    Political Behavior, 2022, 44 : 435 - 454
  • [5] Electoral precinct-level database for Mexican municipal elections
    Bruno Calderón-Hernández
    Horacio Larreguy
    John Marshall
    José Luis Pérez-Castellanos
    Scientific Data, 12 (1)
  • [6] The issue of the legal status of members of precinct electoral commissions as public officials
    Zych, Radoslaw
    PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2022, (05): : 201 - 223
  • [7] PROBLEMS WITH ELECTORAL EVALUATIONS OF EXPERT OPINIONS
    SORENSEN, RA
    BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1984, 35 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [9] ESTABLISHING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN ELECTORAL PROCESS
    HEARD, A
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1976, 425 (MAY): : 143 - 149
  • [10] The Context of "Confidence": Analyzing the Term Confidence in Resident Evaluations
    Heath, Janae K.
    Alvarado, Meagan E.
    Clancy, Caitlin B.
    Barton, Todd D.
    Kogan, Jennifer R.
    Dine, C. Jessica
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (09) : 2187 - 2193