Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand

被引：69

作者：

Parsons, GR ^{[1
]}

Hauber, AB

机构：

[1] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA

[2] Res Triangle Inst, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA

来源：

LAND ECONOMICS | 1998年 / 74卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/3147211

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

We are concerned with the definition of choice set used in Random Utility Models of recreation demand. In particular, we are concerned with the spatial boundaries used to define choice sets. In this paper, using a model of day-trip fishing in Maine, we examine the sensitivity of parameter and welfare estimates to changes in the spatial boundary. We find that there exists some threshold distance beyond which adding more sites to the choice set has negligible effects on the estimation results.

引用

页码：32 / 48

页数：17

共 50 条

[1] Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of recreation demand
Haab, TC
Hicks, RL
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 34 (02) : 127 - 147
[2] Spatial random utility model with an application to recreation demand
Smirnov, Oleg A.
Egan, Kevin J.
[J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (01) : 72 - 78
[3] Narrow choice sets in a random utility model of recreation demand
Parsons, GR
Plantinga, AJ
Boyle, KJ
[J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2000, 76 (01) : 86 - 99
[4] COMPENSATORY RESTORATION IN A RANDOM UTILITY MODEL OF RECREATION DEMAND
Parsons, George R.
Kang, Ami K.
[J]. CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2010, 28 (04) : 453 - 463
[5] A DEMAND THEORY FOR NUMBER OF TRIPS IN A RANDOM UTILITY MODEL OF RECREATION
PARSONS, GR
KEALY, MJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (03) : 357 - 367
[6] A SET-THEORETIC RANDOM UTILITY MODEL OF CHOICE BEHAVIOR
EDGELL, SE
GEISLER, WS
[J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 21 (03) : 265 - 278
[7] MODELING RECREATION DEMAND WITHIN A RANDOM UTILITY FRAMEWORK
SMITH, VK
KAORU, Y
[J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1986, 22 (04) : 395 - 399
[8] Defining the choice set in a random utility model: Empirical evidence.
Tatos, T
Waters, S
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) : 1733 - 1733
[9] BENEFITS TRANSFER IN A RANDOM UTILITY MODEL OF RECREATION
PARSONS, GR
KEALY, MJ
[J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1994, 30 (08) : 2477 - 2484
[10] SITE AGGREGATION IN A RANDOM UTILITY MODEL OF RECREATION
PARSONS, GR
NEEDELMAN, MS
[J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1992, 68 (04) : 418 - 433

← 1 2 3 4 5 →