Risk-based inspection and maintenance (RBIM) - Multi-attribute decision-making with aggregative risk analysis

被引:62
|
作者
Khan, FI [1 ]
Sadiq, R
Haddara, MM
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St Johns, NF A1B 8X5, Canada
[2] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Res Construct, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
risk-based inspection; risk-based maintenance; fuzzy; multi-attribute decision-making; aggregative risk analysis;
D O I
10.1205/psep.82.6.398.53209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing complexity of oil and gas installations and operations, along with growing public awareness to ensure higher levels of safety, has put great pressure on the designers and operators to find innovative solutions to ensure safe as well as economically viable operation. Risk-based inspection and maintenance helps in finding such solutions and thus in gaining more importance in the industries. A wide range of methodologies currently in use for risk-based inspection includes commercial and in-house software packages (specific to individual plants). The techniques with software produce very different results, raising serious concerns. A recent benchmarking study conducted by the British Health and Safety Laboratory has confirmed the lack of a coherent approach as well as wide variation in the results of the case studies conducted by different agencies. Here, we present a simple and structured risk-based inspection and maintenance methodology that can bridge this gap. The proposed methodology uses fuzzy logic to estimate risk by combining (fuzzy) likelihood of occurrence of and its (fuzzy) consequence. The methodology is based on aggregative risk analysis and multi-attribute decision-making. Application and effectiveness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using four case studies conducted earlier by different agencies. The results obtained are fairly consistent with little variation and the sensitivity of the proposed method is also discussed in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 411
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method for Risk-Based Ship Design
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xueqian
    Yuan, Yuchao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (13):
  • [2] The Study on Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Risk Based on Linguistic Variable
    Liu P.
    Zhang X.
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2010, 3 (5) : 601 - 609
  • [3] The Study on Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Risk Based on Linguistic Variable
    Liu, Peide
    Zhang, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2010, 3 (05) : 601 - 609
  • [4] Risk-Based Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Normal Cloud Model Considering Pre-Evaluation Information
    Ma, Zhenzhen
    Zhang, Shitao
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 153891 - 153904
  • [5] Research on grey multi-attribute risk group decision-making method
    Dang, Luo
    Ling, Zhou
    Shuai, Sheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREY SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT SERVICES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 754 - 758
  • [6] Integrated Method of Grey Multi-attribute Risk Group Decision-Making
    Dang, Luo
    Ling, Zhou
    ADVANCES IN GREY SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, : 437 - 448
  • [7] A FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD UNDER RISK WITH UNKNOWN ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS
    Han, Zuosheng
    Liu, Peide
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2011, 17 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [8] Coastal buildings and infrastructure flood risk analysis using multi-attribute decision-making
    Mojtahedi, S. M. H.
    Oo, B. L.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2016, 9 (01): : 87 - 96
  • [9] Research on Decision-Making of EMUs Maintenance Based on Triangular Fuzzy multi-Attribute
    Li, Li
    Wang, Hui
    Sun, Peng
    Chen, Yan
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY (AIBT 2021), 2021, : 17 - 20
  • [10] Multi-attribute decision-making based on the SPIFGIA operators
    Wang C.
    Fu X.
    Meng S.
    He Y.
    Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (4) : 321 - 331