Nerve-Sparing Approach Reduces Sexual Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy

被引:32
|
作者
Bogani, Giorgio [1 ]
Serati, Maurizio [1 ]
Nappi, Rossella [2 ]
Cromi, Antonella [1 ]
di Naro, Edoardo [3 ]
Ghezzi, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[2] IRCCS S Matteo Fdn, Res Ctr Reprod Med Gynecol Endocrinol & Menopause, Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Bari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bari, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2014年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
Radical Hysterectomy; Nerve Sparing; Sexual Function; Laparoscopy; Female Sexual Function Index; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; DIFFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; BLADDER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/jsm.12702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionAlthough growing evidence suggests the beneficial effects of a nerve-sparing (NS) approach to surgery in cervical cancer patients, only limited data on NS laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) are available, and no studies have investigated the effects of NS-LRH on sexual function. AimThis study aims to determine whether the implementation of NS-LRH impacts on sexual function in cervical cancer patients. MethodsSexually active cervical cancer patients undergoing type C (class III) LRH between 2004 and 2013 were enrolled in this prospective study. Main Outcome MeasuresPreoperative and postoperative sexual function were assessed using a validated questionnaire, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI evaluates desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. ResultsForty patients undergoing radical hysterectomy (20 conventional LRH vs. 20 NS-LRH) represented the study group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P>0.05). No differences in preoperative FSFI scores were recorded (P>0.05). We observed that both LRH and NS-LRH worsened postoperative FSFI scores (P<0.001). However, patients undergoing NS-LRH had higher postoperative FSFI scores than patients undergoing LRH (21.39.4 vs. 14.2 +/- 12.5; P=0.04). Considering postoperative domain scores, we observed that desire, arousal, orgasm, and pain scores were similar between groups (P>0.05), while patients undergoing NS-LRH experienced higher lubrication (3.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 1.7 +/- 2.2; P=0.02) and satisfaction (4.6 +/- 3.9 vs. 2.8 +/- 2.2; P=0.004) scores in comparison with patients undergoing conventional LRH. No between-group differences in survival outcomes were found. ConclusionsBoth conventional LRH and NS-LRH impact negatively on patients' sexual function. However, the NS approach impairs sexual function less, minimizing the effects of radical surgery. Bogani G, Serati M, Nappi R, Cromi A, di Naro E, and Ghezzi F. Nerve-sparing approach reduces sexual dysfunction in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Sex Med 2014;11:3012-3020.
引用
收藏
页码:3012 / 3020
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic Pelvic Anatomy of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy
    Park, Nae Yoon
    Cho, Young Lae
    Park, Il Soo
    Lee, Yoon Soon
    [J]. CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2010, 23 (02) : 186 - 191
  • [2] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Description of the technique and patients' outcome
    Kavallaris, A.
    Hornemann, A.
    Chalvatzas, N.
    Luedders, D.
    Diedrich, K.
    Bohlmann, M. K.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (02) : 198 - 201
  • [3] Bladder function after laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
    Plotti, Francesco
    Zullo, Marzio Angelo
    Montera, Roberto
    Angioli, Roberto
    Pierluigi, Benedetti Panici
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (02) : 315 - 315
  • [4] Extended nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
    Kato, T
    Utsugi, K
    Kobayashi, Y
    Umezawa, S
    Hasumi, K
    Takizawa, K
    [J]. Proceedings of the XIX Asian and Oceanic Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, : 269 - 273
  • [5] Step-by-step Type C Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Nerve-sparing Approach
    Centini, Gabriele
    Afors, Karolina
    Murtada, Rouba
    Castellano, Jesus
    Lazzeri, Lucia
    Fernandes, Rodrigo
    Wattiez, Arnoud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 545 - 545
  • [6] EXTENDED NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    Kato, T.
    Tsukada, T.
    Yoneoka, Y.
    Kato, M.
    Tanase, Y.
    Uno, M.
    Ishikawa, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A230 - A230
  • [7] Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
    Neto, J. S.
    Siufi, D. F. S.
    Magrina, J. F.
    [J]. MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2015, 67 (03): : 281 - 287
  • [8] ROBOTIC NERVE-SPARING VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN EARLY CERVICAL CANCER : URINARY DISEASES
    Narducci, F.
    Merlot, B.
    Bresson, L.
    Nickers, P.
    Leblanc, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [9] Current concepts and practical techniques of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
    Kyo, Satoru
    Kato, Tomoyasu
    Nakayama, Kentaro
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 207 : 80 - 88
  • [10] Effect of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Bladder Function Recovery
    Liu, Qing
    Li, Peiquan
    Sun, Yuxin
    Zhang, Shu
    Liu, Kaijiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (04) : 381 - 386