Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis:: review of three techniques

被引:40
|
作者
Alkan, A. [1 ]
Oezer, M.
Bas, B.
Bayram, M.
Celebi, N.
Inai, S.
Oezden, B.
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Samsun, Turkey
[4] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis (MSDO) is an alternative strategy to correct mandibular transverse deficiencies and dental crowding. Only a limited number of practitioners have reported their clinical experience and potential complications of this procedure to widen the mandible in a large case series. This study involved retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Three different types of distractor were used to widen the mandible: tooth-borne in 21 patients, bone-borne in 5 patients and hybrid (both bone and tooth-borne) in 14 patients. The distraction amount ranged from 7 to 11 mm (mean 7.31 mm). While 39 patients underwent successful mandibular symphyseal distraction, there was one failure. Most of the complications were experienced in bone-borne distractors, such as breakage of the distractor rod, gingival recession, secondary infection and ptosis of the chin. In the light of these findings, it is suggested that a lingually placed tooth-borne hyrax appliance is more suitable and reliable than the other distraction devices. Further larger studies are needed in order to better evaluate the effectiveness of bone-borne or hybrid devices.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on mandibular structures
    Malkoc, Siddik
    Iseri, Haluk
    Karaman, Ali Ihya
    Mutiu, Necip
    Kucukkolbasi, Hasan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (05) : 603 - 611
  • [2] DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF MANDIBULAR SYMPHYSEAL DEFECTS
    ANNINO, DJ
    GOGUEN, LA
    KARMODY, CS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1994, 120 (09) : 911 - 916
  • [3] Microscopic evaluation of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Duran, I
    Malkoc, S
    Iseri, H
    Tunali, M
    Tosun, M
    Küçükkolbasi, H
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [4] Taking the guesswork out of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Braun, S
    Hnat, WP
    Hnat, TW
    Legan, HL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 119 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [5] Mandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis: Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Considerations
    Conley, R.
    Legan, H.
    [J]. INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2006, 38 (02): : 102 - 110
  • [6] Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: Diagnosis and treatment planning considerations
    Conley, R
    Legan, H
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2003, 73 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [7] Treatment of unilateral buccal crossbite with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Ozkalayci, Nurhat
    Ozer, Mete
    Sumer, Mahmut
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 41 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [8] Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis
    Boccaccio, A.
    Cozzani, M.
    Pappalettere, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (02) : 113 - 120
  • [9] Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis using a bone-supported distractor
    Bayram, Mehmet
    Ozer, Mete
    Alkan, Alper
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (04) : 745 - 752
  • [10] Outcome of Mandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis With Bone-Borne Devices
    Raoul, Gwenael
    Wojcik, Thomas
    Ferri, Joel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (02) : 488 - 493