Computed tomography versus plain radiography assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is more predictive for native hip survivorship

被引:11
|
作者
Verbeek, Diederik O. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der List, Jelle P. [1 ,2 ]
Helfet, David L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Orthopaed Trauma Serv, Hosp Special Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Surg, Trauma Res Unit, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Acetabular fracture; Hip survivorship; Total hip arthroplasty; Pelvic radiography; Computed tomography; Postoperative reduction; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; INTERNAL-FIXATION; POSTOPERATIVE CT; POSTERIOR WALL;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-019-03192-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Computed tomography (CT) is more accurate than plain pelvic radiography (PXR) for evaluating acetabular fracture reduction. As yet unknown is whether CT-based assessment is more predictive for clinical outcome. We determined the independent association between reduction quality according to both methods and native hip survivorship following acetabular fracture fixation. Materials and methods Retrospectively, 220 acetabular fracture patients were reviewed. Reductions on PXR were graded as adequate or inadequate (0-1 mm or > 1 mm displacement) (Matta's criteria). For CT-based assessment, adequate reductions were defined as < 1 mm step and < 5 mm gap, and inadequate reductions as >= 1 mm step and/or >= 5 mm gap displacement. Predictive values and Kaplan-Meier hip survivorship curves were compared and risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were identified. Results Mean follow-up was 8.9 years (SD 5.6, range 0.5-23.3 years), and 52 patients converted to THA (24%). Adequate reductions according to CT versus PXR assessment were associated with higher predictive values for native hip survivorship (92% vs. 82%; p = 0.043). Inadequate reductions were equally predictive for conversion to THA (33% for CT and 30% for PXR; p = 0.623). For both methods, survivorship curves of adequate versus inadequate reductions were significantly different (p = 0.030 for PXR, p < 0.001 for CT). Only age >= 50 years (p < 0.001) and inadequate reductions as assessed on CT (p = 0.038) were found to be independent risk factors for conversion to THA. Reduction quality as assessed on PXR was not found to be independently predictive for this outcome (p = 0.585). Conclusion Native hip survivorship is better predicted based on postoperative CT imaging as compared to PXR assessment. Predicting need for THA in patients with inadequate reductions based on both assessment methods remains challenging. While both PXR and CT-based methods are associated with hip survivorship, only an inadequate reduction according to CT assessment was an independent risk factor for conversion to THA.
引用
收藏
页码:1667 / 1672
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computed tomography versus plain radiography assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is more predictive for native hip survivorship
    Diederik O. Verbeek
    Jelle P. van der List
    David L. Helfet
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019, 139 : 1667 - 1672
  • [2] Standard Versus Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Assessment of Acetabular Fracture Reduction
    Gibbs, Stephen
    Carney, John
    Erdman, Mary K.
    Telis, Alexander
    Lee, Adam K.
    Fleming, Mark E.
    Lee, Jackson
    White, Eric
    Marecek, Geoffrey S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2020, 34 (09) : 462 - 468
  • [3] Postoperative CT Is Superior for Acetabular Fracture Reduction Assessment and Reliably Predicts Hip Survivorship
    Verbeek, Diederik O.
    van der List, Jelle P.
    Villa, Jordan C.
    Wellman, David S.
    Helfet, David L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (20): : 1745 - 1752
  • [4] Quantitative Three-Dimensional Measurements of Acetabular Fracture Displacement Could Be Predictive for Native Hip Survivorship
    Meesters, Anne M. L.
    Oldhoff, Miriam G. E.
    Trouwborst, Neeltje M.
    Assink, Nick
    Kraeima, Joep
    Witjes, Max J. H.
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    ten Duis, Kaj
    IJpma, Frank F. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [5] Correlation of Measurements of the Prearthritic Hip Between Plain Radiography and Computed Tomography
    Air, Mary E.
    Harrison, Julian R.
    Nguyen, Joseph T.
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Bogner, Eric A.
    Moley, Peter J.
    [J]. PM&R, 2019, 11 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [6] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY IN EXPERIMENTAL FRACTURE-HEALING
    BRAUNSTEIN, EM
    GOLDSTEIN, SA
    KU, J
    SMITH, P
    MATTHEWS, LS
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1986, 15 (01) : 27 - 31
  • [7] Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications
    Morison, Zachary
    Moojen, Dirk Jan F.
    Nauth, Aaron
    Hall, Jeremy
    Mckee, Michael D.
    Waddell, James P.
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (02) : 392 - 398
  • [8] Comparison of sagittal computed tomography and plain film radiography in a scaphoid fracture model
    Temple, CLF
    Ross, DC
    Bennett, JD
    Garvin, GJ
    King, GJW
    Faber, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 30A (03): : 534 - 542
  • [9] Standard versus low-dose computed tomography for assessment of acetabular fracture reduction using novel step and gap measurement technique
    Abrianna S. Robles
    Amit S. Piple
    Donald J. DeSanto
    Ashley Lamb
    Stephen J. Gibbs
    Nathanael D. Heckmann
    Geoffrey S. Marecek
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2023, 33 : 3703 - 3709
  • [10] Standard versus low-dose computed tomography for assessment of acetabular fracture reduction using novel step and gap measurement technique
    Robles, Abrianna S.
    Piple, Amit S.
    DeSanto, Donald J.
    Lamb, Ashley
    Gibbs, Stephen J.
    Heckmann, Nathanael D.
    Marecek, Geoffrey S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08): : 3703 - 3709