ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION IN MEXICO: INSIGHTS ON THE PROJECT PLANNING PHASE

被引:17
|
作者
Martinez-Garza, Cristina [1 ]
Mendez-Toribio, Moises [2 ]
Ceccon, Eliane [3 ]
Guariguata, Manuel R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Estado Morelos, Ctr Invest Biodiversidad & Conservac, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
[2] Inst Ecol AC, Red Diversidad Biol Occidente Mexicano, Ctr Reg Bajio, Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Reg Invest Multidisciplinarias, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
[4] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Lima, Peru
关键词
ecosystem services; Forest Landscape Restoration; reference ecosystem; remediation; socioecological complexity; unassisted forest regeneration; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; NATURAL REGENERATION; FOREST RESTORATION; TROPICAL FOREST; CONSERVATION; SUCCESSION;
D O I
10.17129/botsci.2695
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background: A deep discussion of the phases of planning by all stakeholders will help to identify the challenges faced by countries that are embarking on large-scale restoration actions to comply with international agreements. Question: Was the planning phase of restoration projects done according to international guidance? We evaluated six of the eight aspects of the international guidance for the planning phase of restoration projects carried out in Mexico between 1979 and 2016. Methods: The information about the restoration projects was compiled using a digital survey composed of 137 questions. Results: Seventy-five projects with a total area of 1,556,840 hectares were analyzed, mainly in temperate, humid, and deciduous forest. More projects measured the baseline with biotic than with abiotic variables, and social variables were seldom evaluated. Most projects aimed to recover biodiversity or ecosystem services, and they identified a reference ecosystem. Planned budgets included mainly field work. Conclusions: To promote the integration of ecological, social, and economic priorities, landscape restoration is suggested, since it is done at a scale which maximizes the benefits for nature and people. The inclusion of only field work in the budgets may decrease the total cost, but it may jeopardize project success due to poor planning. Careful and detailed planning of a national strategy constructed by all stakeholders that includes restoration of original ecosystems, agroforestry systems (which facilitate social participation and increase land productivity) and patches under natural succession, and investing in highly trained human resources will allow successful compliance with international restoration commitments.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 256
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mt Trumbull Ecosystem Restoration Project
    Taylor, R
    CONFERENCE ON ADAPTIVE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT: RESTORATION OF CORDILLERAN CONIFER LANDSCAPES OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 278 : 75 - 79
  • [2] Assessing the value of the Central Everglades Planning Project (CEPP) in Everglades restoration: An ecosystem service approach
    Richardson, Leslie
    Keefe, Kelly
    Huber, Christopher
    Racevskis, Laila
    Reynolds, Gregg
    Thourot, Scott
    Miller, Ian
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 107 : 366 - 377
  • [3] Spatial Planning Principles for Marine Ecosystem Restoration
    Lester, Sarah E.
    Dubel, Alexandra K.
    Hernan, Gema
    McHenry, Jennifer
    Rassweiler, Andrew
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [4] Mount trumbull ponderosa pine ecosystem restoration project
    Davis, R
    Bauman, J
    PORTLAND'99: PIONEERING NEW TRAILS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 204 - 209
  • [5] Mount Trumbull ponderosa pine ecosystem restoration project
    Taylor, GJ
    Bauman, JL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS, 2000 NATIONAL CONVENTION, 2001, : 446 - 446
  • [6] Mount Trumbull ponderosa pine ecosystem restoration project
    Davis, R
    Bauman, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS 1999 NATIONAL CONVENTION, 2000, : 204 - 209
  • [7] Mt. Trumbull Ponderosa Pine Ecosystem Restoration Project
    Moore, K
    Davis, B
    Duck, T
    FIRE, FUEL TREATMENTS, AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2002, (29): : 117 - 132
  • [8] Applying ecosystem benefit valuation to inform quarry restoration planning
    Wilker, Jost
    Rusche, Karsten
    Benning, Alexander
    MacDonald, Michael A.
    Blaen, Phillip
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 : 44 - 55
  • [9] Stressors, Ecosystem Services, and Restoration Strategies for a Central New Mexico Arroyo
    Schoener, Gerhard
    Stone, Mark C.
    INTERNATIONAL LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE 2020 - SETTING THE VISION FOR THE NEXT TWENTY YEARS, 2020, : 115 - 129
  • [10] Coastal Louisiana ecosystem assessment and restoration program: The role of ecosystem forecasting in evaluating restoration planning in the Mississippi river deltaic plain
    Twilley, Robert R.
    Couvillion, Brady R.
    Hossain, Imtiaz
    Kaiser, Carola
    Owens, Alaina B.
    Steyer, Gregory D.
    Visser, Jenneke M.
    MITIGATING IMPACTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS ON FISHERY ECOSYSTEMS, 2008, 64 : 29 - +