Costs and Benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board

被引:63
|
作者
Wagner, Todd H.
Murray, Christine
Goldberg, Jacquelyn
Adler, Jeanne M.
Abrams, Jeffrey
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[3] NCI, Cent Inst Review Board Initiat, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Clin Invest Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NCI, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; CARE; RISK;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In 2001, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) formed the Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) to conduct a single human subjects review for its multisite phase III oncology trials. The goal of this study was to assess whether NCI's CIRB was associated with lower effort, time, and cost in processing adult phase III oncology trials. Methods We conducted an observational study and compared sites affiliated with the NCI CIRB to unaffiliated sites that used their local IRB for review. Oncology research staff and IRB staff were surveyed to understand effort and timing. Response rates were 60% and 42%, respectively. Analysis of these survey data yielded information on effort, timing, and costs. We combined these data with CIRB operational data to determine the net savings of the CIRB using a societal perspective. Results CIRB affiliation was associated with faster reviews (33.9 calendar days faster on average), and 6.1 fewer hours of research staff effort. CIRB affiliation was associated with a savings of $717 per initial review. The estimated cost of running the CIRB was $161,000 per month. The CIRB yielded a net cost of approximately $55,000 per month from a societal perspective. Whether the CIRB results in higher or lower quality reviews was not assessed because there is no standard definition of review quality. Conclusion The CIRB was associated with decreases in investigator and IRB staff effort and faster protocol reviews, although savings would be higher if institutions used the CIRB as intended.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 666
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research
    Massett, Holly A.
    Hampp, Sharon L.
    Goldberg, Jacquelyn L.
    Mooney, Margaret
    Parreco, Linda K.
    Minasian, Lori
    Montello, Mike
    Mishkin, Grace E.
    Davis, Catasha
    Abrams, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (08) : 819 - +
  • [2] COSTS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
    BROWN, JHU
    SCHOENFELD, LS
    ALLAN, PW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1979, 54 (04): : 294 - 299
  • [3] Variability in the costs of institutional review board oversight
    Byrne, Margaret M.
    Speckman, Jeanne
    Getz, Ken
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (08) : 708 - 712
  • [4] Genetic protocols review by institutional review boards at National Cancer Institute designated cancer centers
    Allen, HJ
    [J]. GENETIC TESTING, 1998, 2 (04): : 329 - 336
  • [5] Sounding board - A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials.
    Christian, MC
    Goldberg, JL
    Killen, J
    Abrams, JS
    McCabe, MS
    Mauer, JK
    Wittes, RE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (18): : 1405 - 1408
  • [6] National Cancer Institute: A Review
    Marton, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2007, 11 (04) : 73 - 75
  • [7] Central Institutional Review Board Review for an Academic Trial Network
    Kaufmann, Petra
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (03) : 321 - 323
  • [8] AACE enhances institutional ties with the National Cancer Institute
    Gallagher, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2002, 17 (03) : 114 - 114
  • [9] Public health research: Institutional review board review or no institutional review board review?
    Koller, Kathryn R.
    Powell, Terry J.
    Wolfe, Abbie W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 165 (02): : 420 - 420
  • [10] Institutional Review Board
    Pearson, Geraldine S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2020, 26 (06) : 523 - 524