COVID-19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review

被引:165
|
作者
Al-Amer, Rasmieh [1 ,2 ]
Della Maneze [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Everett, Bronwyn [2 ,4 ]
Montayre, Jed [2 ,4 ]
Villarosa, Amy R. [2 ,4 ]
Dwekat, Entisar [1 ]
Salamonson, Yenna [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Isra Univ Jordan, Nursing Sch, Amman, Jordan
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[3] Multicultural Hlth Serv, South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
[4] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Ctr Oral Hlth Outcomes & Res Translat COHORT, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
关键词
coronavirus; COVID-19; vaccination; vaccine acceptance; vaccine hesitancy; vaccine uptake; INFLUENZA VACCINE; HESITANCY; ACCEPTABILITY; DETERMINANTS; ACCEPTANCE; NURSES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15951
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives To synthesise evidence regarding vaccination intention, identify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals and the general populations globally. Background As COVID-19 vaccine becomes available worldwide, attention is being directed to community vaccine uptake, to achieve population-wide immunity. A number of factors have been reported to influence vaccine intention. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of COVID-19 vaccination intention related literature published on or before 31 December 2020 from seven databases was undertaken. Results Thirty articles were included in this systematic review. Overall COVID-19 vaccination intention during the first year of the pandemic ranged from 27.7% to 93.3%. Findings highlighted that socio-demographic differences, perceptions of risk and susceptibility to COVID-19 and vaccine attributes influenced vaccination intention. Healthcare professionals particularly, nurses have higher vaccine hesitancy reportedly due to concerns regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and mistrust of health authorities. Negative information about COVID-19 vaccines in the social media and low confidence in the health system were associated with lower acceptability among the community. Interestingly, cumulative increase in COVID-19 caseloads of countries over time was not associated with vaccination intention. Conclusions The significant variability in vaccine intention rates worldwide would hamper efforts to achieve immunity against COVID-19. Nurses' concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy need to be addressed to increase vaccine acceptance and maximise their influence on vaccination decision in the community. As misinformation through social media negatively impacts vaccination uptake, authoritative and reliable information on vaccine attributes, disease risks and vaccination benefits are needed. Relevance to clinical practice Concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy including misinformation are important contributors to vaccine hesitancy. Addressing these factors, particularly among nurses who are considered trusted influencers of vaccination decisions in the community is an important strategy for pandemic preparedness.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 86
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review
    Borges, Lysandro Pinto
    Martins, Aline Fagundes
    Silva, Breno de Mello
    Dias, Bruna de Paula
    Goncalves, Ricardo Lemes
    Souza, Daniela Raguer Valadao de
    Oliveira, Makson Gleydson Brito de
    Jesus, Pamela Chaves de
    Serafini, Mairim Russo
    Quintans, Jullyana Souza Siqueira
    Coutinho, Henrique Douglas Melo
    Martins, Natalia
    Quintans Junior, Lucindo Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 101
  • [2] Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Influenza Vaccination Intention: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Kong, Gwyneth
    Lim, Nicole-Ann
    Chin, Yip Han
    Ng, Yvonne Peng Mei
    Amin, Zubair
    [J]. VACCINES, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [3] A Systematic Review of the Impact of the First Year of COVID-19 on Obesity Risk Factors: A Pandemic Fueling a Pandemic?
    Daniels, Natasha Faye
    Burrin, Charlotte
    Chan, Tianming
    Fusco, Francesco
    [J]. CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 6 (04):
  • [4] Therapeutic Interventions Implemented During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Evidence
    Asut, Ozen
    Cali, Sanda
    [J]. CYPRUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 7 (03): : 287 - 302
  • [5] Potential Neurological Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Non-systematic Review of the Literature During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Asif, Khadija
    Abbas, Farhat
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 28 (03) : 129 - 133
  • [6] Correlates of turnover intention among nursing staff in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Katharina Herta Tolksdorf
    Ulla Tischler
    Katherina Heinrichs
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 21
  • [7] Clinical Features of COVID-19 Patients in the First Year of Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al Maqbali, Mohammed
    Al Badi, Khalid
    Al Sinani, Mohammed
    Madkhali, Norah
    Dickens, Geoffrey L.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR NURSING, 2022, 24 (02) : 172 - 185
  • [8] Correlates of turnover intention among nursing staff in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Tolksdorf, Katharina Herta
    Tischler, Ulla
    Heinrichs, Katherina
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [9] Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review
    Verrienti, Martina
    Picciola, Valentino Marino
    Ambrosio, Maria Rosaria
    Zatelli, Maria Chiara
    [J]. PITUITARY, 2024,
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Zinat Nadia Hatmi
    [J]. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2021, 3 (2) : 419 - 436