Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for direct detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex obtained from sputum samples

被引:13
|
作者
Kiraz, Nuri [1 ]
Saglik, Imran [1 ]
Kiremitci, Abdurrahman [1 ]
Kasifoglu, Nilgun [1 ]
Akgun, Yurdanur [1 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol, Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
CLINICAL-SAMPLES; AMPLIFICATION; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.1099/jmm.0.013490-0
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
An increase in the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) in recent years has accelerated the search for novel tools for the rapid diagnosis of TB infection. This study evaluated the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct (GTMD) assay (Hain Lifescience) for direct detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) from sputum samples and compared it with conventional methods. The GTMD test is a commercial assay produced using strip techniques and works based on a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technique. This test allows 23S rRNA amplification-based detection of MTBC, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium malmoense directly from decontaminated clinical samples within 6 h. In the present study, 115 sputum samples were processed to detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) using two microscopy methods (carbol fuchsin and fluorescent staining), two culture methods [Lowenstein-Jensen (U) and BACTEC 12B media] and the GTMD test. The results showed that 86 of the samples were positive by direct microscopy, 84 were positive by BACTEC 12B culture, 73 were positive by U culture and 95 were positive by the GTMD test. All of the isolates turned out to be MTBC. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of the GTMD test for MTBC in patients were 97 and 58%, respectively, taking the culture combination as the gold standard. When the test was compared with culture of samples from anti-TB-treated patients, the sensitivity and specificity for the test were 100 and 15%, respectively. Low specificity in treated people might arise from depressed proliferation of AFB. As the two methods target the same living bacilli, the difference is obviously notable. When the culture results and clinical findings of the patients were evaluated together (true-positive specimens), the sensitivity and specificity values of the GTMD test for all patients were 97 and 90%, respectively. However, both of these values increased to 100% for the patients receiving anti-TB treatment. These results implied that, to determine whether the patient's sputum contains living AFB, more sensitive techniques should be employed during the follow-up of the patients. These observations suggest that the GTMD method can be useful for early diagnosis of clinically and radiologically suspicious TB cases where smears are negative for Mycobacterium. In addition, the use of a GTMD test in smear-positive cases is helpful and practical in order to identify MTBC quickly. This allows more rapid treatment decisions and infection control precautions.
引用
收藏
页码:930 / 934
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of GenoType Mycobacteria Direct Assay in Comparison with Gen-Probe Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplified Direct Test and GenoType MTBDRplus for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Clinical Samples
    Neonakis, Ioannis K.
    Gitti, Zoe
    Baritaki, Stavroula
    Petinaki, Efi
    Baritaki, Maria
    Spandidos, Demetrios A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (08) : 2601 - 2603
  • [2] Evaluation of the GenoType mycobacteria direct assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in clinical samples
    de Luna, F. Franco-Alvarez
    Ruiz, P.
    Gutierrez, J.
    Casal, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (08) : 3025 - 3027
  • [3] Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in human samples
    Garrino, MG
    Glupczynski, Y
    Degraux, J
    Nizet, H
    Delmée, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (01) : 229 - 232
  • [4] Evaluation of the FASTPlaqueTB assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens
    Muzaffar, R
    Batool, S
    Aziz, F
    Naqvi, A
    Rizvi, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2002, 6 (07) : 635 - 640
  • [5] Evaluation of the BDProbeTec™ ET DTB assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from clinical samples
    Maugein, J
    Fourche, J
    Vacher, S
    Grimond, C
    Bebear, C
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2002, 44 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [6] Evaluation of direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rifampin resistance by a nitrate reductase assay applied to sputum samples in Cotonou, Benin
    Affolabi, Dissou
    Odoun, Mathieu
    Martin, Anandi
    Palomino, Juan Carlos
    Anagonou, Severin
    Portaels, Francoise
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (07) : 2123 - 2125
  • [7] Direct detection from clinical sputum samples to differentiate live and dead Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
    Lu, Jie
    Zheng, Huiwen
    Chu, Ping
    Han, Shujing
    Yang, Hui
    Wang, Zhongdong
    Shi, Jin
    Yang, Zuosen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2019, 33 (03)
  • [8] Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for the simultaneous detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in smear-positive respiratory specimens
    Seagar, A. -Louise
    Prendergast, Carmel
    Emmanuel, F. Xavier
    Rayner, Alan
    Thomson, Susan
    Laurenson, Ian F.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 57 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [9] Direct and early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance from sputum smears
    Bhutia, R.
    Narain, K.
    Devi, K. R.
    Singh, T. S. K.
    Mahanta, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (02) : 258 - 261
  • [10] Evaluation of the abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine tissue samples
    Valente, C
    Cuteri, V
    Ausili, E
    Piersimoni, C
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 26 (01) : 21 - 27