Managing spatial sustainability trade-offs: The case of wind power

被引:19
|
作者
Lehmann, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Ammermann, Kathrin [3 ]
Gawel, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Geiger, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
Hauck, Jennifer [4 ]
Heilmann, Jorg [5 ]
Meier, Jan-Niklas [1 ,2 ]
Ponitka, Jens [3 ]
Schicketanz, Sven [6 ]
Stemmer, Boris [7 ]
Tafarte, Philip [1 ,2 ]
Thraen, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Wolfram, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Fac Econ & Business Sci, Ritterstr 12, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat BfN, Alte Messe 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[4] CoKnow Consulting, Muhlweg 3, D-04838 Jesewitz, Germany
[5] Juwi AG, Alten Flugpl 1, D-04821 Brandis, Germany
[6] Bosch & Partner GmbH, Kantstr 63a, D-10627 Berlin, Germany
[7] Univ Appl Sci Ostwestfalen Lippe, Dept Landscape Architecture & Environm Planning, Wilhelrushohe 44, D-37671 Hoxter, Germany
关键词
Equity; Germany; Renewable Energies; Energies; Serious Game; Spatial Optimization; FARM SITE SELECTION; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; GIS; SYSTEM; GAMES; CONFLICTS; COOPERATION; LOCATIONS; SCENARIOS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107029
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The deployment of onshore wind power involves spatial sustainability trade-offs, e.g., between the minimization of energy system costs, the mitigation of impacts on humans and biodiversity, and interregional equity concerns. We analyze challenges arising for decision-making if wind power generation capacity has to be allocated spatially in the presence of such trade-offs. The analysis is based on a participatory multi-criteria analysis that involved stakeholders in Germany. Stakeholders were asked to play a serious game during which they had to allocate wind power generation capacity to German states. The results of the serious game illustrate that there is no unanimously agreed ranking of sustainability criteria among the participating stakeholders. They disagreed not only on the weights of different criteria but also their definition and measurement. Group discussions further revealed that interregional equity concerns mattered when generation capacity was allocated to states. Yet, stakeholders used quite different concepts of interregional equity, including approaches of both distributional and commutative justice. The results support the importance of transparent, multi-level and participatory approaches to take decisions on the spatial allocation of wind power generation capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment
    Morrison-Saunders, Angus
    Pope, Jenny
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 54 - 63
  • [2] Managing power, performance and reliability trade-offs
    Raghavan, Padma
    Kandemir, Mahmut
    Irwin, Mary Jane
    Malkowski, Konrad
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL & DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 2656 - 2660
  • [3] Case Studies on Trade-Offs in Corporate Sustainability
    Winn, Monika
    Pinkse, Jonatan
    Illge, Lydia
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (02) : 63 - 68
  • [4] Analysis of Spatial Trade-Offs for a Spinal SRS Case
    Viulet, T.
    Blanck, O.
    Schlaefer, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 231 - 231
  • [5] Trade-offs in managing resources and capabilities
    Teng, BS
    Cummings, JL
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (02): : 81 - 91
  • [6] Tire Operational and Sustainability Trade-Offs
    Pottinger, Marion G.
    [J]. TIRE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 43 (01) : 2 - 41
  • [7] Spatial Trade-Offs between Wind Power Production and Bird Collision Avoidance in Agricultural Landscapes
    Eichhorn, Marcus
    Drechsler, Martin
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (02):
  • [8] Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources
    Heather Keith
    Michael Vardon
    John A. Stein
    Janet L. Stein
    David Lindenmayer
    [J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 1 : 1683 - 1692
  • [9] Ecosystem accounts define explicit and spatial trade-offs for managing natural resources
    Keith, Heather
    Vardon, Michael
    Stein, John A.
    Stein, Janet L.
    Lindenmayer, David
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 1 (11): : 1683 - 1692
  • [10] Spatial trade-offs between ecological and economical sustainability in the boreal production forest
    Mazziotta, Adriano
    Borges, Paulo
    Kangas, Annika
    Halme, Panu
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 330