Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients

被引:52
|
作者
Boutet, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Rashid, Tanweer [3 ]
Hancu, Ileana [4 ]
Elias, Gavin J. B. [2 ]
Gramer, Robert M. [2 ]
Germann, Jurgen [2 ]
Dimarzio, Marisa [3 ]
Li, Bryan [2 ]
Paramanandam, Vijayashankar [2 ,4 ]
Prasad, Sreeram [2 ,4 ]
Ranjan, Manish [2 ]
Coblentz, Ailish [1 ,2 ]
Gwun, Dave [2 ]
Chow, Clement T. [2 ]
Maciel, Ricardo [2 ,4 ]
Soh, Derrick [2 ,4 ]
Fiveland, Eric [2 ,5 ]
Hodaie, Mojgan [2 ]
Kalia, Suneil K. [2 ]
Fasano, Alfonso [2 ,4 ]
Kucharczyk, Walter [1 ]
Pilitsis, Julie [3 ,6 ]
Lozano, Andres M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Neurosurg, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, UHN,Div Neurol, Edmond J Safra Program Parkinsons Dis Morton & Gl, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Krembil Brain Inst, GE Global Res Ctr Niskayuna, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Albany, NY USA
关键词
SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; PARKINSON-DISEASE; FIELD-STRENGTH; IN-VITRO; SYSTEMS; IMPLANT; DBS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190546
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: With growing numbers of patients receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS), radiologists are encountering these neuro-modulation devices at an increasing rate. Current MRI safety guidelines, however, limit MRI access in these patients. Purpose: To describe an MRI (1.5 T and 3 T) experience and safety profile in a large cohort of participants with active DBS systems and characterize the hardware-related artifacts on images from functional MRI. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, study participants receiving active DBS underwent 1.5- or 3-T MRI (T1-weighted imaging and gradient-recalled echo [GRE]-echo-planar imaging [EPI]) between June 2017 and October 2018. Short- and long-term adverse events were tracked. The authors quantified DBS hardware-related artifacts on images from GRE-EPI (functional MRI) at the cranial coil wire and electrode contacts. Segmented artifacts were then transformed into standard space to define the brain areas affected by signal loss. Two-sample t tests were used to assess the difference in artifact size between 1.5- and 3-T MRI. Results: A total of 102 participants (mean age +/- standard deviation, 60 years +/- 11; 65 men) were evaluated. No MRI-related short- and long-term adverse events or acute changes were observed. DBS artifacts were most prominent near the electrode contacts and over the frontoparietal cortical area where the redundancy of the extension wire is placed subcutaneously. The mean electrode contact artifact diameter was 9.3 mm +/- 1.6, and 1.9% +/- 0.8 of the brain was obscured by the coil artifact. The coil artifacts were larger at 3 T than at 1.5 T, obscuring 2.1% +/- 0.7 and 1.4% +/- 0.7 of intracranial volume, respectively (P < .001). The superficial frontoparietal cortex and deep structures neighboring the electrode contacts were most commonly obscured. Conclusion: With a priori local safety testing, patients receiving deep brain stimulation may safely undergo 1.5- and 3-T MRI. Deep brain stimulation hardware-related artifacts only affect a small proportion of the brain. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 183
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correction of metal-induced susceptibility artifacts for functional MRI during deep brain stimulation
    In, Myung-Ho
    Cho, Shinho
    Shu, Yunhong
    Min, Hoon-Ki
    Bernstein, Matt A.
    Speck, Oliver
    Lee, Kendall H.
    Jo, Hang Joon
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 158 : 26 - 36
  • [2] Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices
    Tagliati, Michele
    Jankovic, Joseph
    Pagan, Fernando
    Susatia, Frandy
    Isaias, Ioannis U.
    Okun, Michael S.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 47 : T53 - T57
  • [3] Safety assessment of spine MRI in deep brain stimulation patients
    Boutet, Alexandre
    Elias, Gavin J. B.
    Gramer, Robert
    Neurdorfer, Clemens
    Germann, Jurgen
    Naheed, Asma
    Bennett, Nicole
    Li, Bryan
    Gwun, Dave
    Chow, Clement T.
    Maciel, Ricardo
    Valencia, Alejandro
    Fasano, Alfonso
    Munhoz, Renato P.
    Foltz, Warren
    Mikulis, David
    Hancu, Ileana
    Kalia, Suneil K.
    Hodaie, Mojgan
    Kucharczyk, Walter
    Lozano, Andres M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (06) : 973 - 983
  • [4] Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
    Boutet, Alexandre
    Chow, Clement T.
    Narang, Keshav
    Elias, Gavin J. B.
    Neudorfer, Clemens
    Germann, Juergen
    Ranjan, Manish
    Loh, Aaron
    Martin, Alastair J.
    Kucharczyk, Walter
    Steele, Christopher J.
    Hancu, Ileana
    Rezai, Ali R.
    Lozano, Andres M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (02) : 250 - 262
  • [5] Functional MRI during Hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation in the Healthy Rat Brain
    Van Den Berge, Nathalie
    Vanhove, Christian
    Descamps, Benedicte
    Dauwe, Ine
    van Mierlo, Pieter
    Vonck, Kristl
    Keereman, Vincent
    Raedt, Robrecht
    Boon, Paul
    Van Holen, Roel
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [6] False positive analysis of functional MRI during simulated deep brain stimulation
    Liu, H. L.
    Huang, C. M.
    Lim, S. N.
    Kuan, W. C.
    Chen, H. M.
    Wu, T.
    Hsu, Y. Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2012 - 2012
  • [7] MB-SWIFT functional MRI during deep brain stimulation in rats
    Lehto, Lauri J.
    Idiyatullin, Djaudat
    Zhang, Jinjin
    Utecht, Lynn
    Adriany, Gregor
    Garwood, Michael
    Grohn, Olli
    Michaeli, Shalom
    Mangia, Silvia
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 159 : 443 - 448
  • [8] Functional MRI with active, fully implanted, deep brain stimulation systems: Safety and experimental confounds
    Carmichael, David W.
    Pinto, Serge
    Limousin-Dowsey, Patricia
    Thobois, Stephane
    Allen, Philip J.
    Lemieux, Louis
    Yousry, Tarek
    Thornton, John S.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 37 (02) : 508 - 517
  • [9] MRI and deep brain stimulation: Safety-related considerations
    Baker, KB
    Nyenhuis, JA
    Tkach, J
    Sharan, A
    Shellock, FG
    Rezai, AR
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2004, 19 : S385 - S386
  • [10] MRI is safe in patients with deep brain stimulation therapy
    Uitti, RJ
    Poole, R
    Putzke, JD
    Wszolek, Z
    Felmlee, J
    Wharen, RE
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2002, 17 : S205 - S205