Evaluation of the Impact of Using a Simulator for Teaching Veterinary Students Cerebrospinal Fluid Collection: A Mixed-Methods Study

被引:6
|
作者
Langebaek, Rikke [1 ]
Berendt, Mette [2 ]
Tipold, Andrea [3 ]
Engelskirchen, Simon [4 ]
Dilly, Marc [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Dyrlaegevej 16, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Vet Clin & Anim Sci, Dyrlaegevej 16, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Univ Vet Med, Small Anim Clin, Vet Neurol, Buenteweg 9, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
[4] Vet Ctr Small Anim Duisburg Asterlagen, Dr-Detlef Karsten Rhowedder Str 11, D-47228 Duisburg, Germany
[5] Scil Vet Acad, Scil Anim Care GmbH, Diana Weissmann Allee 6, D-68519 Viernheim, Germany
关键词
clinical skills; validation; mixed method; simulator; students' perception; neurology; veterinary education; learning; SURGICAL SKILLS; SELF-EFFICACY; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.3138/jvme.2019-0006
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of central nervous system diseases. Prior training in this invasive procedure is essential to minimize the risk of harming animals. Because of this risk, stress and anxiety can influence the learning process. Simulators can be used to teach and learn invasive procedures. The aim of this mixed-methods study was to validate a CSF collection simulator and investigate students' perceptions of the simulator as an educational tool. The quantitative approach validated the simulator for face and content validity, and students provided a general evaluation of the simulator using surveys. The simulator's construct validity was measured by means of a global rating scale. Students' perceptions were investigated qualitatively using semi-structured interviews. Experts (n = 13) confirmed the simulator's face and content validity. Students (n = 16) evaluated the simulator as supportive of their learning. Results for construct validity demonstrated higher global rating scores from experts than from students. The scores for procedural performance and procedural knowledge and flow showed significant differences (p = .05). Analysis of interviews with students (n = 10) revealed four main themes: emotions, learning process, evaluation of the model, and CSF collection procedure. In conclusion, this study validated the use of the CSF simulator as an educational tool that can help students overcome some of their anxiety in relation to performing an invasive procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 227
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE IMPACT OF GEOGRAPHY INFORMATION SYSTEM INTEGRATED TEACHING ON STUDENTS' MOTIVATION TO LEARN GEOGRAPHY: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION STUDY
    Singh, Soon Singh Bikar
    [J]. ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 4313 - 4321
  • [2] A Mixed-Methods Survey of Veterinary Ethics Teaching in Turkey
    Golcu, Berfin Melikoglu
    uensal Adaca, Aytac
    Yerlikaya, Nigar
    Ozen, Dogukan
    Basagac Gul, R. Tamay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 51 (01) : 72 - 84
  • [3] Using Poverty Simulation for College Students: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Todd, Maureen
    de Guzman, Maria Rosario T.
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 6 (02): : 72 - 77
  • [4] Students' perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis
    Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.
    Witcher, Ann E.
    Collins, Kathleen M. T.
    Filer, Janet D.
    Wiedmaier, Cheryl D.
    Moore, Chris W.
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 44 (01) : 113 - 160
  • [5] Assessing Moral Judgements in Veterinary Students: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study from Germany
    Persson, Kirsten
    Gerdts, Wiebke-Rebekka
    Hartnack, Sonja
    Kunzmann, Peter
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [6] Exploring Nursing Students' Experiences With Different Teaching Pedagogies: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Browne, Caroline
    Wall, Peter
    Walters, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2022, 61 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [7] Preparing Teaching Assistants in Nursing A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Heitkemper, Elizabeth M.
    Hafermann, Kelly A.
    Honig, Judy C.
    Smaldone, Arlene
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATOR, 2021, 46 (06) : E179 - E183
  • [8] Using a Hyper-Flexible Online Teaching Approach: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Brabin, Jodie
    Jakimowicz, Samantha
    [J]. STUDENT SUCCESS, 2024, 15 (02): : 10 - 22
  • [9] The impact of anencephaly on parents: A mixed-methods study
    Berry, Shandeigh N.
    Severtsen, Billie
    Davis, Andra
    Nelson, Lonnie
    Hutti, Marianne H.
    Oneal, Gail
    [J]. DEATH STUDIES, 2022, 46 (09) : 2198 - 2207
  • [10] The research experience of postgraduate students: a mixed-methods study
    Wang, Faming
    King, Ronnel B. B.
    Zeng, Lily Min
    Zhu, Yue
    Leung, Shing On
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (04) : 616 - 629