Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions

被引:4
|
作者
Devir, Cigdem [1 ]
Kebapci, Mahmut [2 ]
Temel, Tuncer [3 ]
Ozakyol, Aysegul [3 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Dumlupinar Univ, Dept Radiol, Res & Training Hosp, Kutahya, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Radiol, Fac Med, Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Fac Med, Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
Colonography; Computed Tomographic; Colonoscopy; Colonic Polyps; Colorectal Neoplasms; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; CATHARTIC PREPARATION; EXTRACOLONIC FINDINGS; COLONIC DISTENSION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE; POLYP DETECTION; CANCER; LIMITATIONS; NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.19518
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Colon cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The early detection of colorectal cancer using screening programs is important for managing early-stage colorectal cancers and polyps. Modalities that allow examination of the entire colon are conventional colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema examination and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) colonography. Objectives: To compare CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy results and to evaluate the accuracy of CT colonography for detecting colorectal lesions. Patients and Methods: In a prospective study performed at Gastroenterology and Radiology Departments of Medical Faculty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, CT colonography and colonoscopy results of 31 patients with family history of colorectal carcinoma, personal or family history of colorectal polyps, lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, change in bowel habits, iron deficiency anemia and abdominal pain were compared. Regardless of the size, CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy findings for all the lesions were cross tabulated and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. To assess the agreement between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy examinations, the Kappa coefficient of agreementt was used. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS ver 15.0. Results: Regardless of the size, MDCT colonography showed 83% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 83% for the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. MDCT colonography displayed 92% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 95% for polyps >= 10 mm. For polyps between 6mm and 9 mm, MDCT colonography displayed 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 90%. For polyps <= 5 mm MDCT colonography displayed 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 95%. Conclusions: CT colonography is a safe and minimally invasive technique, a valuable diagnostic tool for examining the entire colon and a good alternative compared to other colorectal cancer screening tests because of its high sensitivity values in colorectal lesions over 1 cm.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective comparison of 64 multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Chang, Uk Sun
    Park, Dong Kyun
    Kim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, Yu Kyung
    Kwon, Kwang An
    Yu, Sang Kyun
    Song, Kee Sup
    Jung, Hyuk Sang
    Jang, Chang Soo
    Kim, Min Ju
    Park, Chul Hee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 : A503 - A503
  • [2] Prospective comparison of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection
    Yee, J
    Hung, RK
    Steinauer-Gebauer, AM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 340 - 340
  • [3] Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions
    Sakamoto, Takashi
    Mitsuzaki, Katsuhiko
    Utsunomiya, Daisuke
    Matsuda, Katsuhiko
    Yamamura, Sadahiro
    Urata, Joji
    Kawakami, Megumi
    Yamashita, Yasuyuki
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (07) : 714 - 719
  • [4] Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia
    Laghi, A
    Iannaccone, R
    Carbone, I
    Catalano, C
    Panebianco, V
    Di Giulio, E
    Schillaci, A
    Passariello, R
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (06) : 441 - 446
  • [5] Colorectal neoplasms: Prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection
    Macari, M
    Bini, EJ
    Xue, XN
    Milano, A
    Katz, SS
    Resnick, D
    Chandarana, H
    Krinsky, G
    Klingenbeck, K
    Marshall, CH
    Megibow, AJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) : 383 - 392
  • [6] Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology
    Ajaj, W
    Pelster, G
    Treichel, U
    Vogt, FM
    Debatin, JF
    Ruehm, SG
    Lauenstein, TC
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (12) : 1738 - 1743
  • [7] Comparison of CT Colonography with Conventional Colonoscopy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis
    Prabhakar, Nidhi
    Kalra, Naveen
    Bhasin, Deepak K.
    Rana, Surinder S.
    Gupta, Vikas
    Singh, Rajinder
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (03) : 296 - 302
  • [8] Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
    Martin-Lopez, J. E.
    Beltran-Calvo, C.
    Rodriguez-Lopez, R.
    Molina-Lopez, T.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (03) : O82 - O89
  • [9] Comparison of Optical Colonoscopy and CT Colonography for Polyp Detection
    Dachman, Abraham H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (05) : 1289 - 1290
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of CT colonography with limited cathartic preparation in colorectal cancer screening; comparison with conventional colonoscopy
    Amin, Mohammed Farghally
    Hassanin, Ayman Mohammed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (03): : 591 - 598