What Is the Optimal Target Convective Volume in On-Line Hemodiafiltration Therapy?

Conventional diffusion-based dialysis modalities including high-flux hemodialysis are limited in their capacity to effectively remove large uremic toxins and to improve outcomes for end-stage chronic kidney disease (ESKD) patients. By increasing convective solute transport, hemodiafiltration (HDF) enhances solute removal capacity over a broad range of middle-and large-size uremic toxins implicated in the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, by offering flexible convection volume, online HDF permits customizing the treatment dose to the patient's needs. In addition, convective-based modalities have been shown to improve hemodynamic stability and to reduce patients' inflammation profile -both of which are implicated in CKD morbidity and mortality. Growing clinical evidence indicates that HDF-based modalities provide ESKD patients with a number of clinical and biological benefits, including improved outcomes. Interestingly, it has recently emerged that the clinical benefits associated with HDF are positively associated with the total ultrafiltered volume per session (and per week), namely convective dose. In this chapter, we revisit the concept of convective dose and discuss the threshold value above which an improvement in ESKD patient outcome can be expected. This particular point will be addressed by stratifying the level of efficacy of convective volumes, schematically defined as minimal, optimal, personalized, and maximal. In addition, factors and best clinical practices implicated in the achievement of an optimal convective dose are reviewed. To conclude, we show how HDF differs from standard hemodialysis and why HDF offers a paradigm shift in renal replacement therapy. (c) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel