Effects of different chemotherapy regimens on survival for advanced cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Tzioras, Spyridon
Pavlidis, Nicholas
Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
Ioannidis, John P. A.
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Clin Trials & Evidence Based Med Univ, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[3] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Div Med Oncol, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[4] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Biomed Res Inst, Ioannina, Greece
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Dept Med, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; advanced stage; meta-analysis; chemotherapy; randomized controlled trials; survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A large number of trials have assessed various chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer, but there is uncertainty about the magnitude of survival benefits. Methods: We searched (last update January 2006) for trials in women with locally advanced or disseminated cervical cancer that compared neo-adjuvant or concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy atone; or different chemotherapy regimens among themselves (with or without background radiotherapy in both arms). Sixty-five trials were identified with survival data on 11,180 women. Resutts for survival were combined with fixed and random effects models and between-study heterogeneity was estimated. Separate results were obtained for different regimens, cycle length, and type of chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant, concurrent, without radiotherapy). Results: Twenty two comparisons had survival. data on 3837 women randomized to receive chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy atone; the summary relative hazard for mortality was 0.95, 95% CI, 0.83-1.08. Modest between-study heterogeneity (I-2 = 38%) seemed to be due to contradictory results in early trials; trials published in the last decade had a summary relative hazard 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.02) and no between-study heterogeneity (I-2 = 0%).Results were similar for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Cisplatin or cisplatin-based combinations had no significant benefit overall, but a potential benefit was seen with short-length cycles (<= 14 days) and a marginally significant harm with longer-length cycles (summary relative hazards 0.80, 95% CI, 0.66-0.99 and 1.18, 95% CI, 1.02-1.38, respectively). The summary relative hazard was 1.02, (95% CI, 0.84-1.24) for trials using neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00) for trials using concurrent chemotherapy. Conclusions: Evidence on chemotherapy in women with advanced cervical cancer is not encouraging for major survival benefits. However, small benefits have been observed in some trials, especially with short-length cycles of cisplatin-based regimens and concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 38
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gillian K Gresham
    George A Wells
    Sharlene Gill
    Christopher Cameron
    Derek J Jonker
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 14
  • [2] Chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gresham, Gillian K.
    Wells, George A.
    Gill, Sharlene
    Cameron, Christopher
    Jonker, Derek J.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [3] The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Li, Yan
    Zhou, Yaoyao
    Hong, Yonglan
    He, Meizhi
    Wei, Shuyi
    Yang, Chen
    Zheng, Dayong
    Liu, Feiye
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [4] Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wagner, A. D.
    Grothe, W.
    Haerting, J.
    Kleber, G.
    Grothey, A.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 210 - 210
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Xiao
    Fang, Jin
    Zhang, Lu
    Huang, Yao
    Shen, Hui
    Ma, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Shuixing
    Zhang, Bin
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 184
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Horeweg, Nanda
    Mittal, Prachi
    Gradowska, Patrycja L.
    Boere, Ingrid
    Nout, Remi A.
    Chopra, Supriya
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 172
  • [7] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Borghi, Chiara
    Biagioli, Elena
    Mauro, Jessica
    Roberto, Anna
    Borghese, Martina
    Buda, Alessandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [8] Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7260): : 531 - 535
  • [9] Chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azizi, Alexander A.
    Lamarca, Angela
    McNamara, Mairead G.
    Valle, Juan W.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 163
  • [10] Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sakura Iizumi
    Atsuo Takashima
    Kentaro Sakamaki
    Satoshi Morita
    Narikazu Boku
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2018, 81 : 981 - 989