Current Imaging paradigms in radiation oncology

被引:48
|
作者
Apisarnthanarax, S
Chao, KSC
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Expt Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1667/RR3279
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The technological revolution in imaging during recent decades has transformed the way image-guided radiation therapy is performed. Anatomical imaging (plain radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) greatly improved the accuracy of delineating target structures and has formed the foundation of 3D-based radiation treatment. However, the treatment planning paradigm in radiation oncology is beginning to shift toward a more biological and molecular approach as advances in biochemistry, molecular biology, and technology have made functional imaging (positron emission tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, optical imaging) of physiological processes in tumors more feasible and practical. This review provides an overview of the role of current imaging strategies in radiation oncology, with a focus on functional imaging modalities, as it relates to staging and molecular profiling (cellular proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, hypoxia, receptor status) of tumors, defining radiation target volumes, and assessing therapeutic response. In addition, obstacles such as imaging-pathological validation, optimal timing of post-therapy scans, spatial and temporal evolution of tumors, and lack of clinical outcome studies are discussed that must be overcome before a new era of functional imaging-guided therapy becomes a clinical reality. (C) 2005 by Radiation Research Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Radiation Oncology
    Le, Quynh-Thu
    Shirato, Hiroki
    Giaccia, Amato J.
    Koong, Albert C.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (15) : 3393 - 3401
  • [2] Imaging for Response Assessment in Radiation Oncology: Current and Emerging Techniques
    Stieb, Sonja
    Kiser, Kendall
    van Dijk, Lisanne
    Livingstone, Nadia Roxanne
    Elhalawani, Hesham
    Elgohari, Baher
    McDonald, Brigid
    Ventura, Juan
    Mohamed, Abdallah Sherif Radwan
    Fuller, Clifton David
    [J]. HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 34 (01) : 293 - +
  • [3] Current developments in radiation oncology
    Khan, FM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 208 - 208
  • [4] IMAGING OPPORTUNITIES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
    Balter, James M.
    Haffty, Bruce G.
    Dunnick, N. Reed
    Siegel, Eliot L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (02): : 342 - 347
  • [5] Molecular Imaging in Radiation Oncology
    Gregoire, V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S55 - S55
  • [6] Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Perspective
    Dawson, Laura A.
    Menard, Cynthia
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (04): : 338 - 349
  • [7] Radiation oncology and functional imaging
    Herrmann, T
    [J]. NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 44 : S38 - S40
  • [8] Advances in imaging for radiation oncology
    Kessler, ML
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 106 - 106
  • [9] Quantitative Imaging for Radiation Oncology
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (04): : 683 - 686
  • [10] Personalized imaging in radiation oncology
    Wang, Dongxu
    Nixon, Earl
    Oldham, Amy
    Flynn, Ryan
    Buatti, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (01): : 211 - 211