Comparison of the Performance of the Methods Used to Find the Weibull Parameters at Different Heights

In this study, the coefficients of Weibull Distribution Function (WDF) were calculated at two different heights using by six different methods. One-year wind data were used to determine the coefficients of WDF at different heights, and the wind data were obtained from a metrology station with a height of 10 m and a real wind turbine with a height of 80 m in Turkey's Hatay region. The used methods in this study were Graphical Method (GM), Empirical Method, Energy Pattern Method (EPM), Energy Trend Method, Maximum Likelihood Method and Moment Method.\ Three different statistical error analysis tests were used to compare the performance of the used methods at two different heights. Estimated mean wind speed and power values are the most important indicators to evaluate the performance of the used methods. In this study, mean wind speeds and powers were estimated in all methods for both heights using the WDF. These obtained values were compared with the actual real data and the best performing method was determined at both different heights for selected region. When the results were evaluated in general at both different heights, it was seen that the best performance method was the EPM and the worst performance method was the GM.