Particle size distribution quantification by microscopic observation

被引:9
|
作者
Yamamoto, N
Shinozuka, Y
Kumagai, K
Fujii, M
Yanagisawa, Y
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Environm Studies, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Dept Environm Syst,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Oceanog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
line-sensing optical microscope; light scattering particle counter; projected area diameter; Mie scattering theory; refractive index;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.05.005
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The particle size distributions measured by the optical microscope (OPM) were compared with those by the light scattering particle counter (PC) to validate the microscopic method for particle size distribution quantification. While the OPM concentrations increased with the PC concentrations, the OPM concentrations tended to be higher than those by the PC. To explain the difference between the two methods, we estimated their relationship based on the Mie scattering theory. The calculation roughly estimated the particle geometric diameters in theory were 1.7-2.0 times as large as the corresponding PC readouts. Using these theoretical factors, the size ranges of the PC were converted to match with the OPM measurements (PC*). Overall, the OPM concentrations were lower than the PC* concentrations. The advantage in the OPM method particularly for ambient aerosols lied in its accuracy of particle sizing although the counting efficiency might be lowered due to its intrinsic limitations such as inability of counting particles having the similar refractive index of the filter. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1234
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computerized microscopic particle size distribution analysis
    Veronese, PK
    Brande, S
    Nonidez, WK
    Gies, AP
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U352 - U352
  • [2] Quantification of Surface Erosion and Microscopic Analysis of Particle Distribution in Polymer Nanocomposites
    Anglhuber, Martin
    Kindersberger, Josef
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 2012, 19 (02) : 408 - 413
  • [3] Observation and Inversion of Aerosol Particle Size Distribution over Yinchuan Area
    Mao, Jiandong
    Ren, Yali
    Li, Juan
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhang, Yi
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [4] The effect of particle size distribution and shape on the microscopic behaviour of loess via the DEM
    Li, Xi-An
    Sun, Jianqiang
    Ren, Hongyu
    Lu, Tuo
    Ren, Yongbiao
    Pang, Tao
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2022, 81 (10)
  • [5] The effect of particle size distribution and shape on the microscopic behaviour of loess via the DEM
    Xi-An Li
    Jianqiang Sun
    Hongyu Ren
    Tuo Lu
    Yongbiao Ren
    Tao Pang
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2022, 81
  • [6] Characterisation of ice and THF hydrate slurry crystal size distribution by microscopic observation method
    Delahaye, Anthony
    Fournaison, Laurence
    Guilpart, Jacques
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DU FROID, 2010, 33 (08): : 1639 - 1647
  • [7] Quantification of lubrication and particle size distribution effects on tensile strength and stiffness of tablets
    Razavi, Sonia M.
    Gonzalez, Marcial
    Cuitino, Alberto M.
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 336 : 360 - 374
  • [8] Scanning electron microscopic determination of the particle size distribution of an agglomerating phase in a metallic melt
    Heyroth, W
    Gerloff, R
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR METALLKUNDE, 1996, 87 (09): : 684 - 690
  • [9] POSSIBILITIES OF DETERMINATION OF THE PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN AN ACTUAL COMPACT MATERIAL BY THE MICROSCOPIC METHOD
    CHERNYAVSKII, KS
    BORTSOV, AN
    POTAPOV, AS
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1984, 50 (05): : 458 - 462
  • [10] IMMUNOCHEMICAL QUANTIFICATION AND PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF AIRBORNE PAPAIN IN A MEAT PORTIONING FACILITY
    SWANSON, MC
    BOIANO, JM
    GALSON, SK
    GRAUVOGEL, LW
    REED, CE
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1992, 53 (01): : 1 - 5