Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Compared to Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery With Regard to Oncologic Outcome

被引:14
|
作者
Rose, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Svensson, Henry [2 ,3 ]
Handler, Juergen [4 ]
Hoyer, Ute [5 ]
Ringberg, Anita [2 ,3 ]
Manjer, Jonas [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Southwest Jutland, Dept Surg, Sect Plast Surg, Finsensgade 35, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Malmo, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Hosp South Jutland, Sect Breast Surg, Dept Surg, Abenra, Denmark
[5] Alborg Univ Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Invasive breast cancer; Oncology; Oncoplastic; CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; SINGLE-INSTITUTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; THERAPEUTIC MAMMAPLASTY; RADIATION-THERAPY; COSMETIC OUTCOMES; SURGICAL MARGINS; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2019.05.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The oncologic outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS; 197 patients) was compared to conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS; 1399 patients) with regard to primary radical excision, time to adjuvant treatment, disease-free survival, and overall survival. There was a lower risk for nonradical primary tumor excision in patients undergoing OBS versus conventional BCS. No other statistically significant differences were found. These results indicate that OBS is a safe procedure. Introduction: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) has been implemented with increasing frequency in the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the oncologic outcome after OBS to the outcome after conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with invasive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: In all, 197 patients treated with OBS were compared to 1399 patients treated with conventional BCS from 2008 to 2013. We evaluated nonradical primary tumor excision, time to initiation of adjuvant therapy, disease-free survival (risk of recurrent disease), and survival (cause specific and overall). Identification of patients and follow-up were made using the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group registry and the Danish Cause of Death registry. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to obtain odds ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There was a lower risk for nonradical primary tumor excision for patients undergoing OBS versus conventional BCS (adjusted odds ratio:95% CI, 0.50:0.29-0.84). No significant differences were found with regard to a delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio:95% CI, 1.14:0.89-1.45) or radiotherapy (0.91:0.71-1.16), disease-free survival (1.23:0.61-2.47), breast cancer as cause of death (1.46:0.52-4.09), breast cancer as underlying or multiple cause of death (0.90:0.34-2.37), or overall survival (0.90:0.51-1.60). Conclusion: We found no significant differences in oncologic outcome comparing OBS to conventional BCS. However, a lower risk of nonradical primary tumor excision was found for patients treated with OBS. These results indicate that OBS is a safe procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / U189
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer
    Michael Rose
    Henry Svensson
    Jürgen Handler
    Ute Hoyer
    Anita Ringberg
    Jonas Manjer
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2020, 180 : 247 - 256
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer
    Rose, Michael
    Svensson, Henry
    Handler, Jurgen
    Hoyer, Ute
    Ringberg, Anita
    Manjer, Jonas
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 180 (01) : 247 - 256
  • [3] Comments on patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer
    Hernanz, Fernando
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 185 (02) : 529 - 530
  • [4] Comments on patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer
    Fernando Hernanz
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 185 : 529 - 530
  • [5] Outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery compared to breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients
    Farooqi, Nifasat
    Vohra, Lubna
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 246 - 247
  • [6] Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study
    Behluli, Ilmi
    Le Renard, Pol-Edern
    Rozwag, Kamila
    Oppelt, Peter
    Kaufmann, Andreas
    Schneider, Achim
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (10) : 1236 - 1241
  • [7] Standards in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery
    Thompson, Peter W.
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Losken, Albert
    [J]. ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2022, 6
  • [8] Complications in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Oncoplastic Versus Conventional Techniques
    Apodaca-Ramos, Irasema
    Alejandro Maciel-Roman, Daniel
    Perez-Gonzalez, Yosef
    Pabel Miranda-Aguirre, Arturo
    Alberto Dominguez-Reyes, Carlos
    Villegas-Carlos, Felipe
    Alberto Tenorio-Torres, Juan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S209 - S209
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis
    Tian, Rui
    Zheng, Yu
    Liu, Ruikang
    Jiang, Chen
    Zheng, Hongmei
    [J]. BREAST, 2024, 77
  • [10] Oncologic Safety of Immediate Oncoplastic Surgery Compared with Standard Breast-Conserving Surgery for Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
    Falade, Israel
    Switalla, Kayla
    Quirarte, Astrid
    Baxter, Molly
    Soroudi, Daniel
    Rothschild, Harriet
    Abe, Shoko Emily
    Goodwin, Karen
    Piper, Merisa
    Wong, Jasmine
    Foster, Robert
    Mukhtar, Rita A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 4337 - 4338