Differences in recognition and impressions of animate and inanimate objects in which features are deleted or added

被引:1
|
作者
Ando, M
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2466/PMS.90.3.1079-1090
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the present study whether adults recognized features added to or deleted from an original pictures (asymmetric effects) when both animate and inanimate objects were presented together as stimuli, whether there was a difference in recognition between animate objects (butterflies and cats) and inanimate objects (artificial objects) and whether types of changes affected impression of pictures and impression predicted recognition were investigated. Ratings of Recognition and Impression were obtained. Analysis showed that adults discovered added features more accurately than deleted features in pictures of artificial objects, discovered deleted features more accurately than added features in pictures of cats, and there was no asymmetry of recognition in pictures of butterflies. There was difference in confidence ratings of recognition between animate and inanimate objects but no difference between them in percentage of correct recognition. Types of changes affected Impression ratings in all three types of objects. Moreover, Impression ratings predicted confidence ratings of pictures of cars and artificial objects but did not in pictures of butterflies. These results showed that asymmetry of recognition of addition and deletion is affected by the number of objects and whether they are animate or inanimate. Asymmetric recognition of additions vs deletions was sometimes mediated by Impression, both when one type of object was presented and when multiple types of objects were presented together.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1090
页数:12
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Classification and recognition of images of animate and inanimate objects
    Moiseenko, G. A.
    Shelepin, Yu. E.
    Kharauzov, A. K.
    Pronin, S. V.
    Chikhman, V. N.
    Vakhrameeva, O. A.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 82 (10) : 685 - 693
  • [2] Electrophysiological differences in perception of animate and inanimate objects
    Kozlovskiy, S.
    Kashirin, V.
    Glazkova, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 188 : 116 - 117
  • [3] SEX DIFFERENCES IN VISUAL REALISM IN DRAWINGS OF ANIMATE AND INANIMATE OBJECTS
    Lange-Kuettner, Chris
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2011, 113 (02) : 439 - 453
  • [4] Contribution of Brain Waves for Visual Differences in Animate and Inanimate Objects in Human Brain
    Gandhi, Tapan
    Panigrahi, Bijaya Ketan
    Santhosh, Jayashree
    Anand, Sneh
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2012, 9 (02) : 233 - 242
  • [5] ORIENTATION INVARIANT RECOGNITION DEPENDS ON THE FEATURES WHICH ARE USED TO DISTINGUISH THE OBJECTS
    LITER, JC
    BRAUNSTEIN, ML
    HOFFMAN, DD
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S472 - S472
  • [6] LaM-2SRN: A Method Which Can Enhance Local Features and Detect Moving Objects for Action Recognition
    Qiao, Yangyang
    Cui, Whenhua
    Shi, Tianwei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 192703 - 192712