FDI and Institutions in BRIC and CIVETS Countries: An Empirical Investigation

被引:8
|
作者
Kechagia, Polyxeni [1 ]
Metaxas, Theodore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Econ, Volos 38334, Greece
关键词
foreign direct investment; institutional quality; panel data analysis; developing economies; BRIC; CIVETS; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLITICAL RISK; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT; POLICY; QUALITY; AFRICA; SPILLOVERS;
D O I
10.3390/economies10040077
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, a number of countries with emerging economies have proceeded to use market-oriented strategies, deregulation and reforms in order to attract more foreign investors and attract foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows. The present paper aims to empirically investigate the role of governance in attracting FDI using panel data and comparing two groups of fast-growing emerging countries, namely BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) and CIVETS (Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South Africa). The study includes a panel data analysis using the latest available secondary data ranging from 2002 to 2019. Empirical models are extended and presented. The findings suggest that FDI inflows in BRICS are attracted by rule of law, regulatory quality, political stability and absence of violence, while CIVETS absorb FDI inflows due to control of corruption, political stability, absence of violence, regulatory quality and government effectiveness. The paper contributes to the existing literature since it is the first attempt to investigate the role of governance in attracting FDI in BRIC and CIVETS economies, taking into consideration other FDI determinants. To our knowledge, it is the first paper to study and compare FDI and institutional determinants in the specific groups of emerging countries.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Investigation of Fisherian Link in BRIC-T Countries
    Bayat, Tayfur
    Kayhan, Selim
    Dogan, Cetin
    [J]. IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2014, 29 (334): : 95 - 120
  • [2] analysis of net FDI drivers in BRIC countries
    Elfakhani, Said
    Mackie, Wayne
    [J]. COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2015, 25 (01) : 98 - +
  • [3] Can FDI explain the growth disparity of the BRIC and the non-BRIC countries? Theoretical and empirical evidence from panel growth regressions
    Khan, Seefat-E-Rabbi
    Asteriou, Dimitrios
    Jefferies, Claudia
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 124
  • [4] Green economic growth in BRIC and CIVETS countries: The effects of trade openness and sustainable development goals
    Halim, Md. Abdul
    Moudud-Ul-Huq, Syed
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [5] BOARDS OF DIRECTORS IN BRIC COUNTRIES: A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES
    Kirpishchikov, D. A.
    Lopez-Iturriaga, F. J.
    Zavertiaeva, M. A.
    [J]. ROSSIISKII ZHURNAL MENEDZHMENTA-RUSSIAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 19 (02): : 195 - 228
  • [6] Quality of institutions and the BRIC countries agro-food exports
    Bojnec, Stefan
    Ferto, Imre
    Fogarasi, Jozsef
    [J]. CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 6 (03) : 379 - 394
  • [7] Re-investigation of the resource curse hypothesis: The role of political institutions and energy prices in BRIC countries
    Hussain, Muzzammil
    Ye, ZhiWei
    Usman, Muhammad
    Mir, Ghulam Mustafa
    Usman, Ahmad
    Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69
  • [8] Political institutions and FDI inflows in autocratic countries*
    Moon, Chungshik
    [J]. DEMOCRATIZATION, 2019, 26 (07) : 1256 - 1277
  • [9] Institutions-FDI Nexus in ECOWAS Countries
    Ajide, K. Bello
    Raheem, Ibrahim Dolapo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN BUSINESS, 2016, 17 (03) : 319 - 341
  • [10] The Influence of Public Institutions on the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Investigation for OECD Countries
    Schneider, Friedrich
    [J]. REVIEW OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2010, 6 (03) : 441 - 468