Pro-Con Debate: Nitrous Oxide for Labor Analgesia

被引:18
|
作者
Vallejo, Manuel C. [1 ]
Zakowski, Mark I. [2 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
DEVELOPING RAT-BRAIN; D-ASPARTATE RECEPTOR; INDUCED NEURONAL DAMAGE; ANESTHETIC-GASES; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; DNA-DAMAGE; EARLY EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL-EXPOSURE; HOMOCYSTEINE CONCENTRATIONS; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION;
D O I
10.1155/2019/4618798
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This Pro-Con debate will provide the practitioner with an evidence-based knowledge approach to assist the clinician in determining whether to employ (Pro) or not to employ (Con) this technique in the obstetrical suite for labor analgesia. Nitrous oxide has been used safely in dentistry and medicine for many centuries. However, accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence increasingly suggests previously unrecognized adverse maternal and fetal effects of nitrous oxide, which warrants reconsideration of its use in pregnant women and a more detailed informed consent. Nitrous oxide is associated with metabolic, oxidative, genotoxic, and transgenerational epigenetic effects in animals and humans that may warrant limiting its usefulness in labor. This debate will discuss and review the clinical uses, advantages, and disadvantages of nitrous oxide on occupational effects of nitrous oxide exposure, neuroapoptosis, FDA warning on inhalational anesthetics and the developing brain, research limitations, occupational exposure safety limits, effects on global warming, and potential for diversion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of nitrous oxide as an adjuvant for inhalation inductions with sevoflurane: a pro-con debate
    Banchs, Richard
    Lerman, Jerrold
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 23 (06) : 557 - 564
  • [2] Pro-Con Debate
    Marshall, Gailen D., Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 122 (06) : 565 - 565
  • [3] Pro-Con Debate Sublingual Immunotherapy
    Custovic, Adnan
    Bourgoin-Heck, Melisande
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2023, 58 : S69 - S71
  • [4] Pro-con
    [J]. ASEE PRISM, 1 (20):
  • [5] Treating IPF-all or nothing? A PRO-CON debate
    Behr, Juergen
    Kolb, Martin
    Cox, Gerard
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2009, 14 (08) : 1072 - 1081
  • [6] Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? a pro-con debate
    Rothfield, Kenneth P.
    Russo, Sebastian G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2012, 24 (07) : 593 - 597
  • [7] Pre-Hospital Blood Transfusion: A Pro-Con Debate
    Nathan, Naveen
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 (04): : 674 - 674
  • [8] Pro-Con Debate: Should Code Sharing Be Mandatory for Publication?
    Melvin, Ryan L.
    Barker, Steven J.
    Kiani, Joe
    Berkowitz, Dan E.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 135 (02): : 241 - 245
  • [9] Pro-Con Debate: Perioperative Research Should Be Color-Blind
    Willer, Brittany L.
    Alalade, Emmanuel
    Toledo, Paloma
    Jimenez, Nathalia
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 137 (05): : 967 - 972
  • [10] Pro-Con Debate: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Industry-Sponsored Research
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Alman, Benjamin
    Treggiari, Miriam M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 (06): : 1055 - 1063