A customer satisfaction evaluation model for logistics services using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

被引:45
|
作者
Lan, Shulin [1 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Zhong, Ray Y. [1 ]
Huang, G. Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, HKU ZIRI Lab Phys Internet, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Business, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Customer satisfaction evaluation; Logistics service; MANUFACTURING EXECUTION SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; REQUIREMENTS; AHP;
D O I
10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0389
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - As the modern manufacturing twining seamlessly with logistics operations for value adding services, logistics service is becoming more and more significant. Under this research background, the purpose of this paper is to introduce an innovative evaluation model for customer satisfaction using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Design/methodology/approach - This model uses triangular fuzzy concept to determine the weight of each index so that subjective or objective weighting is addressed. A case study from two large express companies in China is used to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed model for examining customer satisfaction. Findings - One of the key findings is that Company B has higher customer satisfaction than Company A due to its quick response and flexible logistics strategy. This paper has several contributions. First, A FAHP-based customer satisfaction evaluation model is proposed for the logistics service. Second, the triangular fuzzy concept is introduced to determine the weight of each index so as to addresses the limitation of subjective or objective weighting method. Third, a case study demonstrates the implementation of the model. Research limitations/implications - First, this paper considers the fuzzy AHP for the customer satisfaction evaluation. Comparing with other multi-criteria decision-making methods like data envelopment analysis, evidential reasoning approach, and multi-attribute value theory will be carried out in the near future. Second, the manufacturing modes like make-to-order, make-to-stock, and mass-customized production may have different logistics support so that the final products may reach the final targets quickly. How to evaluate various mode-based logistics and their customer satisfactions have great significance. Finally, Big Data-enabled customer satisfaction evaluation approaches may be a possible solution. Practical implications - Based on the data from questionnaire, it is found that, in practical applications, manufacturing enterprises should amend the index system according to the specific business scope and the production characteristics. Manufacturing enterprises need to collect large amounts of data through market research and conduct the measurement on the related coefficient between the measurement indicators and customer satisfaction degree. After that, they can make sorting and filtering on the measurement index according to the measurement results. Social implications - Customer satisfaction is very important to manufacturing and logistics enterprises due to its time constraints. The physical products with services like logistics are paid close attention to by the final customers. Originality/value - The contribution of this paper is as follows: a FAHP-based customer satisfaction evaluation model is proposed for the logistics service; triangular fuzzy concept is introduced to determine the weight of each index so as to addresses the limitation of subjective or objective weighting method; a case study was used to demonstrate the implementation of the model. One of the key findings is that Company B has higher customer satisfaction than Company B due to its quick response and flexible logistics strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1042
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Mikhailov, L
    Tsvetinov, P
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2004, 5 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [2] An evaluation system for IT outsourcing customer satisfaction using the analytic hierarchy process
    Yoon, YK
    Im, KS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 13 (04) : 55 - 78
  • [3] A Customer Satisfaction Model by Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
    Yang, Chih-Neng
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    [J]. EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 1278 - 1281
  • [4] The Logistics System Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Gan, XianYong
    Yu, Wei
    [J]. ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1014 - 1016
  • [5] Fuzzy synthetic evaluation on customer loyalty based on analytic hierarchy process
    Lu, YL
    Han, JY
    Li, FC
    Li, SS
    [J]. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vols 1-9, 2005, : 2706 - 2710
  • [6] An evaluation model of cruise ports using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Tseng, Po-Hsing
    Yip, Tsz Leung
    [J]. MARITIME BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 6 (01) : 22 - 48
  • [7] A FUZZY ASSESSMENT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION ENTERPRISES BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    Lu, Yan-Li
    Li, Shu-Shan
    Zhang, Bin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS (ICMLC), VOL 2, 2014, : 684 - 688
  • [8] Customer satisfaction evaluation method for customized product development using Entropy weight and Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Li, Li
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Congbo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 77 : 80 - 87
  • [9] An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model
    Peng, Geng
    Han, Lu
    Liu, Zeyan
    Guo, Yanyang
    Yan, Junai
    Jia, Xinyu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [10] A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Soh, SoonHu
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 4 (03): : 339 - 349