Traffic volume prediction using aerial imagery and sparse data from road counts

被引:7
|
作者
Ganji, Arman [1 ]
Zhang, Mingqian [1 ]
Hatzopoulou, Marianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Google Aerial images; Vehicle detection; AADT; Traffic prediction; Pattern Recognition; VEHICLE DETECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2022.103739
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Around the world, metropolitan areas invest in infrastructure for traffic data collection, albeit focusing on highway networks, thus limiting the amount of data available on inner-city roads. For this purpose, various modelling techniques have been developed to interpolate traffic counts spatially and temporally across an entire road network. However, the predictive accuracy of these models depends on the quality and coverage of traffic count data. In this study, we extend the power of spatio-temporal interpolation models with vehicle detection from aerial images, developing a new approach to estimate Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) across all roads in an urban area. Using Google aerial images, we extracted the number of vehicles on a road segment and treated these values as observed traffic counts collected over a short period of time. This information was used as input and merged with traffic count data at stations with longer record lengths to predict traffic on all urban roads. This approach was compared against a holdout sample of roads with observed traffic count data and images, indicating an R-squared (R2) = 90% and RMSE = 7675 between predicted and observed daily traffic counts and R2 = 58% and RMSE = 18918 between observed and predicted AADT. The higher prediction accuracy for daily traffic indicates the power of the proposed method for predicting daily values from images; while the lower accuracy of AADT prediction stresses the need for longer-term data to achieve accurate annual averages based on counts derived from images.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Traffic data collection from aerial imagery
    Schreuder, M
    Hoogendoorn, SP
    Van Zuylen, HJ
    Gorte, B
    Vosselman, G
    [J]. 2003 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS. 1 & 2, 2003, : 779 - 784
  • [2] A Hybrid Stacked Traffic Volume Prediction Approach for a Sparse Road Network
    Tao, Yanjie
    Sun, Peng
    Boukerche, Azzedine
    [J]. 2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ISCC), 2019, : 443 - 448
  • [3] VECTORIZATION OF ROAD DATA EXTRACTED FROM AERIAL AND UAV IMAGERY
    Bulatov, Dimitri
    Haeufel, Gisela
    Pohl, Melanie
    [J]. XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION III, 2016, 41 (B3): : 567 - 574
  • [4] Road detection from Aerial Imagery
    Lin, Yucong
    Saripalli, Srikanth
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2012, : 3588 - 3593
  • [5] Sparse Data Traffic Speed Prediction on a Road Network With Varying Speed Levels
    Beeking, Moritz
    Steinmassl, Markus
    Urban, Melanie
    Rehrl, Karl
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2023, 2677 (06) : 448 - 465
  • [6] Leveraging Crowdsourced GPS Data for Road Extraction from Aerial Imagery
    Sun, Tao
    Di, Zonglin
    Che, Pengyu
    Liu, Chun
    Wang, Yin
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2019), 2019, : 7501 - 7510
  • [7] A framework of road extraction from airborne lidar data and aerial imagery
    Liu, Li
    Lim, Samsung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPATIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 61 (02) : 263 - 281
  • [8] THE PROBLEM OF IMPUTATION OF THE MISSING DATA FROM THE CONTINUOUS COUNTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC
    Splawinska, M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 61 (01) : 131 - 145
  • [9] ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT FROM AERIAL IMAGERY USING DEEP LEARNING
    Merkle, N.
    Henry, C.
    Azimi, S. M.
    Kurz, F.
    [J]. XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION II, 2022, 5-2 : 283 - 289
  • [10] Traffic Volume Prediction on Busy Road Junctions
    Wang, Yubo
    Xu, Ningwei
    Wang, Kaiyu
    Li, Xiangru
    Mu, Lintao
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND BIG DATA (ICCBD 2018), 2018, : 83 - 86