Digital breast tomosynthesis in a population based mammographic screening program: Breast compression and early performance measures

被引:3
|
作者
Moshina, Nataliia [1 ]
Larsen, Marthe [1 ]
Holen, Asne S. [1 ]
Waade, Gunvor G. [1 ,4 ]
Aase, Hildegunn S. [2 ,3 ]
Hofvind, Solveig [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, PO 5313 Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
[2] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
[4] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Digital breast tomosynthesis; Early performance measures; Breast cancer screening; CANCER RISK; PRESSURE; DENSITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109665
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to determine if compression force or pressure could be associated with early performance measures for women screened with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in BreastScreen Norway. Early performance measures included rates of consensus, recall, and screen-detected breast cancer. Method: Data on compression force and pressure, compressed breast thickness and breast characteristics were extracted from an automated software for density assessment of DBT screening examinations for 25,286 women. For descriptive analyses, force (Newton, N) and pressure (kilopascal, kPa) were categorized into quartiles. Analyses were stratified by mammographic view, craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO). Logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to investigate the association between force and pressure as continuous exposures and early performance measures adjusted for age, compressed breast thickness and fibroglandular volume. Results: Mean age of the screened women was 60.7 (SD = 5.2) years. Mean compression force was 90.8 (SD = 14.2) N for CC and 106.3 (SD = 20.6) N for MLO, and pressure was 11.3 (SD = 3.6) kPa for CC and 8.7 (SD = 2.0) kPa for MLO. The highest rates of screen-detected cancer were observed for low force (1.04 % for <82.5 N for CC and 1.07 % for <92.0 N for MLO) and low pressure (1.07 % for <7.2 kPa for MLO). No association was found between force or pressure as continuous exposures and early performance measures in adjusted regression analyses. Conclusions: We found the highest rates of screen-detected cancer for low force and pressure, but no significant association between continuous values of force or pressure and early performance measures in DBT. The findings might indicate that the levels of force and pressure in DBT are of lower significance for screening performance than reported in standard digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?
    Moshina, Nataliia
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 163 (03) : 605 - 613
  • [2] Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?
    Nataliia Moshina
    Sofie Sebuødegård
    Solveig Hofvind
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 163 : 605 - 613
  • [3] Breast tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program
    Taourel, Patrice
    Millet, Ingrid
    Verheyden, Cecile
    [J]. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2016, 26 (3-4) : 178 - 180
  • [4] The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program
    Wang, Jing
    Xuan-Anh Phi
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Daszczuk, Alicja M.
    Feenstra, Talitha L.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Buls, Nico
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lu, Wenli
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (10) : 5437 - 5445
  • [5] The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program
    Jing Wang
    Xuan-Anh Phi
    Marcel J. W. Greuter
    Alicja M. Daszczuk
    Talitha L. Feenstra
    Ruud M. Pijnappel
    Karin M. Vermeulen
    Nico Buls
    Nehmat Houssami
    Wenli Lu
    Geertruida H. de Bock
    [J]. European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 5437 - 5445
  • [6] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Per Skaane
    Sofie Sebuødegård
    Andriy I. Bandos
    David Gur
    Bjørn Helge Østerås
    Randi Gullien
    Solveig Hofvind
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 489 - 496
  • [7] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Gullien, Randi
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [8] Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine T.
    Gullien, Randi
    Skaane, Per
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [9] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [10] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Minimal Breast Compression
    Scaduto, David A.
    Yang, Min
    Ripton-Snyder, Jennifer
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 9412