Reduced radiation fluoroscopy technique for implantation of sacral neuromodulation

被引:0
|
作者
Groegler, Jason [1 ]
Hajiha, Mohammad [1 ]
Wagner, Hillary [1 ]
Jellison, Forrest [1 ]
Amasyali, Akin S. [1 ]
Moghisi, Reihaneh [1 ]
Dickinson, Mark [1 ]
Yune, Junchan Joshua [1 ]
Baldwin, D. Duane [1 ]
Staack, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ Hlth, Dept Urol, 11234 Anderson St,Room A560, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
Sacral neuromodulation; fluoroscopy; radiation; FNUU; male urinary incontinence;
D O I
10.1177/20514158211002964
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment option for urinary urgency and fecal incontinence. Fluoroscopic imaging is used at various steps during lead placement, which exposes the operating room staff and patient to the harmful effects of radiation. The aim of this study is to describe a reduced radiation technique during lead placement for treatment with SNM. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 51 consecutive patients who underwent lead insertion and SNM placement at a single academic institution were investigated. Reduced fluoroscopy (RF; n=11) involved C-arm settings to 1 pulse/second and an activated "low-dose" setting, while conventional fluoroscopy (CF; n=40) involved 30 pulses/second and a deactivated "low-dose" setting. The automatic brightness control and collimation were used optionally in both groups. Comparison of imaging quality, fluoroscopy settings, and radiation exposure during RF and CF was performed. Results: RF settings resulted in significant reduction of radiation compared to CF settings, including the fluoroscopy time (8.61 vs. 48.16 seconds; p<0.001), dose (2.66 vs. 26.25 mGy; p=0.001), and current (1.67 vs. 4.18 mAs; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in total operative time (59.18 vs. 61.33 minutes; p=0.77) and the rate of progression from stage 1 to stage 2 during follow-up (75% vs. 84%; p=0.55). Conclusions: Lead placement for treatment with SNM can be achieved using RF settings without compromising clinical outcomes. Applying the RF technique reduces overall radiation exposure to the patient and the operating room staff. Further validation of RF in a larger prospective cohort study is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 250
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reduced radiation technique for implantation of sacral neuromodulation
    Groegler, Jason
    Hajiha, Mohammad
    Jellison, Forrest
    Amasyali, Akin S.
    Feldkamp, Ashley
    Moghisi, Reihaneh
    Belay, Ruth
    Maldonado, Jonathan
    Dickinson, Mark
    Yune, Junchan Joshua
    Baldwin, D. Duane
    Staack, Andrea
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S228 - S228
  • [2] Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study
    C. Müller
    L. F. Reissig
    S. Argeny
    W. J. Weninger
    S. Riss
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 215 - 221
  • [3] Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study
    Mueller, C.
    Reissig, L. F.
    Argeny, S.
    Weninger, W. J.
    Riss, S.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF TWO SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR IMPLANTING SACRAL NERVE NEUROMODULATION LEADS: FLUOROSCOPY VERSUS NO FLUOROSCOPY
    Rothschild, Jennifer
    Scott, Anne
    De Los Rios, Juan
    Reynolds, W. Stuart
    Kaufman, Melissa
    Milam, Douglas
    Dmochowski, Roger
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [5] Buttock placement of the implantable pulse generator: A new implantation technique for sacral neuromodulation - A multicenter study
    Scheepens, WA
    Weil, EHJ
    van Koeveringe, GA
    Rohrmann, D
    Hedlund, HEM
    Schurch, B
    Ostardo, E
    Pastorello, M
    Ratto, C
    Nordling, J
    van Kerrebroeck, PEV
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (04) : 434 - 438
  • [6] Sacral Neuromodulation: Standardized Electrode Placement Technique
    Matzel, Klaus E.
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Lehur, Paul A.
    Munoz-Duyos, Arantxa
    Ratto, Carlo
    Rydningen, Mona B.
    Sorensen, Michael
    van Kerrebroeck, Philip
    de Wachter, Stefan
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (08): : 816 - 824
  • [7] Long-term efficacy and safety results of the two-stage implantation technique in sacral neuromodulation
    Scheepens, WA
    van Koeveringe, GA
    De Bie, RA
    Weil, EHJ
    van Kerrebroeck, PEV
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (09) : 840 - 845
  • [8] Sacral neuromodulation sensory response stabilizes early after implantation
    Jahn, Hayden
    Savage, Bryan
    Goudelocke, Colin
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S125 - S126
  • [9] IS THE 50% IMPROVEMENT THRESHOLD ADEQUATE FOR PROGRESSION TO IMPLANTATION IN SACRAL NEUROMODULATION?
    Charles, David
    Everett, Ross
    Prebay, Zachary
    Landowski, Truman
    Guralnick, Michael
    O'Connor, R. Corey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E476 - E476
  • [10] Is the 50% improvement threshold adequate for progression to implantation in sacral neuromodulation?
    Charles, David
    Everett, Ross
    Prebay, Zachary
    Landowski, Truman
    O'Connor, R. Corey
    Guralnick, Michael
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S157 - S158