An Easy Tool to Predict Survival in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases

被引:59
|
作者
Westhoff, Paulien G. [1 ]
de Graeff, Alexander [2 ]
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. [3 ]
Bollen, Laurens [4 ]
Dijkstra, Sander P. [4 ]
van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M. [5 ]
van Vulpen, Marco [1 ]
Leer, Jan Willem H. [6 ]
Marijnen, Corrie A. [7 ]
van der Linden, Yvette M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] ARTI Inst Radiat Oncol Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Radiotherapy, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; PALLIATIVE-CARE; FRACTION RADIOTHERAPY; SPINAL COLUMN; MODEL; ONCOLOGISTS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patients with bone metastases have a widely varying survival. A reliable estimation of survival is needed for appropriate treatment strategies. Our goal was to assess the value of simple prognostic factors, namely, patient and tumor characteristics, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and patient-reported scores of pain and quality of life, to predict survival in patients with painful bone metastases. Methods and Materials: In the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 1157 patients were treated with radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. At randomization, physicians determined the KPS; patients rated general health on a visual analogue scale (VAS-gh), valuation of life on a verbal rating scale (VRS-vl) and pain intensity. To assess the predictive value of the variables, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses and C-statistics for discriminative value. Of the final model, calibration was assessed. External validation was performed on a dataset of 934 patients who were treated with radiation therapy for vertebral metastases. Results: Patients had mainly breast (39%), prostate (23%), or lung cancer (25%). After a maximum of 142 weeks' follow-up, 74% of patients had died. The best predictive model included sex, primary tumor, visceral metastases, KPS, VAS-gh, and VRS-vl (C-statistic=0.72, 95% CI=0.70-0.74). A reduced model, with only KPS and primary tumor, showed comparable discriminative capacity (C-statistic=0.71, 95% CI=0.69-0.72). External validation showed a C-statistic of 0.72 (95% CI=0.70-0.73). Calibration of the derivation and the validation dataset showed underestimation of survival. Conclusion: In predicting survival in patients with painful bone metastases, KPS combined with primary tumor was comparable to a more complex model. Considering the amount of variables in complex models and the additional burden on patients, the simple model is preferred for daily use. In addition, a risk table for survival is provided. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 747
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Karnofsky performance score as easy tool to predict survival in patients with painful bone metastases
    Westhoff, P. G.
    De Graeff, A.
    Monninkhof, E. M.
    Van der Steen-Banasik, E. M.
    Van Vulpen, M.
    Leer, J. W. H.
    Marijnen, C. A. M.
    Van der Linden, Y. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S202 - S203
  • [2] Radiation therapy for painful bone metastases
    Eva, Pribozic
    Ivica, Ratosa
    Jasna, But-Hadzic
    ONKOLOGIJA, 2023, 27 (02) : 40 - 46
  • [3] A SIMPLE AND EFFECTIVE DAILY PAIN MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING RADIATION THERAPY FOR PAINFUL BONE METASTASES
    Andrade, Regiane S.
    Proctor, Julian W.
    Slack, Robert
    Marlowe, Ursula
    Ashby, Karlotta R.
    Schenken, Larry L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : 855 - 859
  • [4] Consideration of Functional Status as a Tool to Predict Treatment Interruptions for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation for Bone and Brain Metastases
    Perlow, H.
    Alford, S.
    Kwon, D.
    Griggs, J.
    Ciraula, S.
    Quintana, J.
    Awerbuch, A. W.
    Cassidy, V.
    Yechieli, R.
    Samuels, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E446 - E447
  • [5] The Role of Radiation Therapy in Controlling Painful Bone Metastases
    Stephen Lutz
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2012, 16 : 300 - 306
  • [6] The Role of Radiation Therapy in Controlling Painful Bone Metastases
    Lutz, Stephen
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2012, 16 (04) : 300 - 306
  • [7] Predictive model for survival in patients having repeat radiation treatment for painful bone metastases
    Chow, Edward
    Ding, Keyue
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Wong, Rebecca K. S.
    van der Linden, Yvette M.
    Roos, Daniel
    Hartsell, William F.
    Hoskin, Peter
    Wu, Jackson S. Y.
    Nabid, Abdenour
    Leer, Jan Willem
    Vonk, Ernest
    Babington, Scott
    Demas, William F.
    Wilson, Carolyn F.
    Brundage, Michael
    Zhu, Liting
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 (03) : 547 - 551
  • [8] A Method to Reduce Time to Start for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Spine Metastases
    Glober, G.
    Holmes, T. W.
    Chauhan, B.
    Shah, A. P.
    Dvorak, T.
    Rineer, J. M.
    Kelly, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E451 - E452
  • [9] Considerations for Quality Improvement in Radiation Oncology Therapy for Patients with Uncomplicated Painful Bone Metastases
    Walling, Anne
    Wenger, Neil
    Kaprealian, Tania
    Steinberg, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 (02) : 459 - 460
  • [10] Considerations for Quality Improvement in Radiation Oncology Therapy for Patients with Uncomplicated Painful Bone Metastases
    Walling, Anne M.
    Beron, Phillip J.
    Kaprealian, Tania
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Wenger, Neil S.
    McCloskey, Susan A.
    King, Christopher R.
    Steinberg, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (05) : 478 - 486