Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth

被引:2
|
作者
Tulunoglu, Ö
Tulunoglu, I [1 ]
Ulusu, T
Genç, Y
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pedodont, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Hacettepe, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
microleakage; dentine bonding agents; radioisotope detection;
D O I
10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00029-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the leakage of three resin dentine bonding agents (Prime and Bond, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Probond) and a glass ionomer dentine bonding agent (GC Fujibond LC), in cervical cavities prepared in primary and permanent molar teeth restored with a hybrid composite resin (Tetric). Methods: Cervical cavities without a bevel at the cave-surface margins were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted primary and permanent molar teeth. After being restored, the teeth were stored for 1 week in a saline solution at 37 degrees C and then thermally cycled between 5 and 55 degrees C. Marginal leakage was determined subsequently using a radioactive isotope containing Ca-45 and an autoradiographic technique. Results: The results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in microleakage of the bond between permanent and primary teeth dentine and Fuji Bond LC and Probond dentine bonding agents. The difference between permanent and primary teeth groups for gingival values of the Prime and Bond 2.1 group U = 22.5, p = 0.0355 and the Scotchbond Multipurpose group U = 24.0, p = 0.0406 were statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the occlusal and gingival microleakage values in either primary or permanent teeth with Prime and Bond 2.1, Fuji Bond LC and Probond except the difference at Scotchbond Multipurpose in primary teeth. For primary teeth gingival margins, none of the bonding systems were significantly different from the control group. Conclusions: These results indicate that although no statistically significant differences were found between test and control group values, the use of Fuji II LC in cervical cavities with cementum margins in primary teeth would provide the best resistance to microleakage among the test materials while the use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose would provide the best resistance to microleakage in cervical cavities with cementum margins in permanent teeth. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional and resin modified glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth
    Qvist, V
    Teglers, PT
    Manscher, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 611 - 611
  • [2] Comparison of Glass Carbomer, Giomer, Glass Ionomer and Resin Fissure Sealants on Permanent Molar Teeth
    Bekmezoglu, Zeliha Ercan
    Gungor, Ozge Erken
    Karayilmaz, Huseyin
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY INDONESIA, 2019, 26 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [3] Differential bonds degradation of two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary and permanent teeth
    Marquezan, Marcela
    Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari
    Toledano, Manuel
    de Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela
    Osorio, Raquel
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 37 (11) : 857 - 864
  • [4] Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molarsQuestion: Is glass ionomer cement more effective than composite resin for class II restorations in primary teeth?
    George Jones
    Greig Taylor
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2018, 19 (3) : 86 - 87
  • [5] Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Packable Glass Ionomer Cement, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Giomer to Primary and Permanent Teeth - An In Vitro Study
    Singh, Pooja
    Jha, Manish
    Arora, Kashika
    Bhat, Deepa
    Awchat, Kiran
    Goyal, Garima
    Mitra, Malay
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2021, 10 (19): : 1429 - 1434
  • [6] An in vitro investigation of penetration depth of dentine bonding agents into carious dentine
    Hahn, P
    Hellwig, E
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (11) : 1053 - 1060
  • [7] Bonding to and protecting worn palatal surfaces of teeth with dentine bonding agents
    Sundaram, G
    Bartlett, D
    Watson, T
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (05): : 505 - 509
  • [8] Evaluating Glass Ionomer Cement Longevity in the Primary and Permanent Teeth-An Umbrella Review
    Panetta, Alessandro
    Lopes, Pedro
    Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes
    Rio, Rute
    Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira
    Mello-Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [9] BONDING OF COMPOSITE RESIN TO GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT
    MOUNT, GJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (04) : 824 - 824
  • [10] Effect of Different Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles on the Quality of the Chemical Bond of Glass Ionomer Cement Dentine in Primary Teeth
    Abed, Faisal Mohammed
    Kotha, Sunil Babu
    AlShukairi, Haneen
    Almotawah, Fatmah Nasser
    Alabdulaly, Rwan Abdulali
    Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10