Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein compensates for restricted systemic spread of Potato virus Y in doubly infected tobacco

被引:30
|
作者
Ryang, BS
Kobori, T
Matsumoto, T
Kosaka, Y
Ohki, ST [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Prefecture Univ, Grad Sch Agr & Biol Sci, Sakai, Osaka 5998531, Japan
[2] Kyoto Prefectural Inst Agr Biotechnol, Kyoto 6190244, Japan
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1099/vir.0.80176-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Xanthi-nc) inoculated with a necrotic strain of Potato virus Y(PVY, T01 isolate) developed necrotic symptoms in some systemically infected leaves, but not in younger leaves. However, PVY expressed distinct symptoms not only in the older leaves, but also in the younger leaves, of plants that had been doubly inoculated with PVY and with Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, strain Pepo). A tissue blot immunoassay of tissues from various positions of the stem detected PVY weakly in each stem, but not in the shoot apex, of singly infected plants, whereas PVY was detected at high levels in almost all sections of doubly infected plants. CMV was also detected at high levels in sections of singly and doubly infected plants. Immunohistochemistry of stem tissues showed that in singly infected plants, PVY was confined to external phloem cells and was not detected in internal phloem cells. However, in doubly infected plants, PVY was distributed uniformly throughout whole tissues, including the external phloem, xylem parenchyma and internal phloem cells. In plants that were doubly infected with PVY and PepoDelta2b, a modified CMV that cannot translate the 2b protein, the spread of PVY was restricted as in singly infected plants. These results suggested that the plant host has a counterdefence mechanism that restricts systemic spread of PVY T01, and that the 2b protein of CMV strain Pepo negates this restriction.
引用
收藏
页码:3405 / 3414
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Virulence and differential local and systemic spread of Cucumber mosaic virus in tobacco are affected by the CMV 2b protein
    Soards, AJ
    Murphy, AM
    Palukaitis, P
    Carr, JP
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2002, 15 (07) : 647 - 653
  • [2] INDEPENDENT ASSEMBLY OF VIRIONS IN TOBACCO DOUBLY INFECTED BY POTATO VIRUS X AND POTATO VIRUS Y OR TOBACCO MOSAIC-VIRUS
    GOODMAN, RM
    ROSS, AF
    VIROLOGY, 1974, 59 (01) : 314 - 318
  • [3] INTERACTION OF CUCUMBER-MOSAIC VIRUS AND POTATO VIRUS Y WITH TOBACCO-MOSAIC VIRUS
    PROCHAZKOVA, Z
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1970, 12 (04) : 297 - +
  • [4] Functional analysis of the Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein
    Nemes, K.
    Gellert, A.
    Balazs, E.
    Salanki, K.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S126 - S127
  • [5] Tobacco microRNAs prediction and their expression infected with Cucumber mosaic virus and Potato virus X
    Lang, Qiulei
    Jin, ChunZhi
    Lai, Leiyu
    Feng, Junli
    Chen, Shaoning
    Chen, Jishuang
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1523 - 1531
  • [6] Tobacco microRNAs prediction and their expression infected with Cucumber mosaic virus and Potato virus X
    Qiulei Lang
    ChunZhi Jin
    Leiyu Lai
    Junli Feng
    Shaoning Chen
    Jishuang Chen
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2011, 38 : 1523 - 1531
  • [7] Induction of RNA-mediated Multiple Virus Resistance to Potato virus Y, Tobacco mosaic virus and Cucumber mosaic virus
    Zhu, Chang-Xiang
    Song, Yun-Zhi
    Yin, Guo-Hua
    Wen, Fu-Jiang
    JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 157 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [8] Subcellular distribution analysis of the cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein
    Mayers, CN
    Palukaitis, P
    Carr, JP
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2000, 81 : 219 - 226
  • [9] Cucumber mosaic virus 2b proteins inhibit virus-induced aphid resistance in tobacco
    Tungadi, Trisna
    Donnelly, Ruairi
    Qing, Ling
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Murphy, Alex M.
    Pate, Adrienne E.
    Cunniffe, Nik J.
    Carr, John P.
    MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02) : 250 - 257
  • [10] UNRELATEDNESS OF POTATO VIRUS-Y AND CUCUMBER MOSAIC VIRUS
    ROSS, AF
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1950, 40 (05) : 445 - 452