The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Campion, Tarun Sai David [1 ]
Daly, J. Oliver [2 ]
Wake, Melissa [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ahern, Susannah [6 ]
Said, Joanne M. [1 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Western Hlth, Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Sunshine Hosp, St Albans, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Populat Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Auckland, Liggins Inst, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Western Hlth, Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens Sunshine Hosp, Maternal Fetal Med, St Albans, Vic, Australia
关键词
clinical quality registry; pregnancy; quality; registry; scoping review; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; PATIENT OUTCOMES; MAJOR TRAUMA; OF-CARE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13540
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Pregnancy represents a time of increased morbidity and mortality for women and their infants. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) collect, analyse and report key healthcare quality indicators for patient cohorts to improve patient care. There are limited data regarding existing CQRs in pregnancy. This scoping review aimed to: (1) identify Australian CQRs specific to pregnancy care and describe their general characteristics; and (2) outline their aims and measured outcomes Methods The scoping review was undertaken according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. CQRs were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar), peer consultation, the Australian register of clinical registries and web searches. Details surrounding general characteristics, aims and outcomes were collated. Results We identified two primary sources of information about pregnancy care. (1) Six CQRs are specific to pregnancy (Australia and New Zealand twin-twin transfusion syndrome registry, Australian Pregnancy Register for women with epilepsy and those taking anti-epileptic drugs, National Register of Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy, Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System, Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopaenia Registry and the Diabetes in Pregnancy clinical register). (2) Fourteen observational cohort studies were facilitated by non-pregnancy-specific CQRs where a subsection of patients underwent pregnancy. Conclusions Australian CQRs currently report varied information regarding some selected conditions during pregnancy and offer therapeutic and epidemiological insight into their care. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the lack of a CQR spanning the common problems of pregnancy in general, where significant health, service and economic gains are possible.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 482
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey of Australian clinical registries: can quality of care be measured?
    Evans, S. M.
    Bohensky, M.
    Cameron, P. A.
    McNeil, J.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 41 (1A) : 42 - 48
  • [2] Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review
    Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul
    Kumari, Varuni
    Hoque, Masuma
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Romero, Lorena
    Evans, Sue M.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [3] Indicators of job quality in the Australian aged care workforce: A scoping review
    Carnemolla, Phillippa
    Taylor, Philip
    Gringart, Eyal
    Adams, Claire
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2022, 41 (02) : E94 - E102
  • [4] Barriers and facilitators to using feedback from clinical quality registries: a scoping review protocol
    Al-Qarni, Hussein
    Allida, Sabine M.
    Mcdonagh, Julee
    Ferguson, Caleb
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [5] The quality of residential aged care in the context of the Australian aged care reforms: A scoping review
    Monro, Cathy
    Mackenzie, Lynette
    Dutoit, Sanetta
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2024, 43 (03) : 454 - 462
  • [6] Clinical-quality registries: their role in quality improvement
    McNeil, John J.
    Evans, Sue M.
    Johnson, Niall P.
    Cameron, Peter A.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 192 (05) : 244 - 245
  • [7] Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Mudunna, Chethana
    Caruso, Marisa
    Ahern, Susannah
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [8] Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    Chethana Mudunna
    Marisa Caruso
    Susannah Ahern
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21
  • [9] Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registries
    Tarride, J. E.
    Okoh, A.
    Aryal, K.
    Prada, C.
    Milinkovic, Deborah
    Keepanasseril, A.
    Iorio, A.
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [10] Quality indicators for clinical care of patients with hypertension: scoping review protocol
    Djasri, Hanevi
    Laras, Sekar
    Utarini, Adi
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):