De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy: A randomized experimental study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the risk of adhesion formation and the site of postoperative adhesions after transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted on 66 pigs, randomly allocated to 2 groups of 33 animals that underwent transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic pam-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 techniques in terms of operating time, number of lymph nodes removed, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. More lymphoceles were observed in the extraperitoneal laparoscopy group (P=.0002). The overall adhesion rates were 76% in the transperitoneal group and 43.33% in the extraperitoneal group (P=.04). The adhesion score specific to the operative site was lower in the extraperitoneal group (P=.0005). A stereolocalization study showed that almost all adhesions after transperitoneal laparoscopy were situated in the pam-aortic external irradiation field, whereas adhesions after extraperitoneal laparoscopy were predominantly situated outside this field. CONCLUSION: Extraperitoneal laparoscopy generates significantly fewer adhesions in the pam-aortic irradiation field.