Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review

被引:4
|
作者
Saxena, Abha [1 ]
Lasher, Emily [2 ,4 ]
Somerville, Claire [3 ]
Heidari, Shirin [2 ]
机构
[1] 35 Chemin Valerie, CH-1292 Chambesy, Switzerland
[2] GENDRO, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Grad Inst Int & Dev Studies, Gender Ctr, Case Postale 1672, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Bassett Res Inst, 1 Atwell Rd, Cooperstown, NY 13326 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
ethics committees research; ethics review; gender; gender and sex; research ethics guidelines; pregnant women; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; HEALTH; QUALITY; AFRICA; EQUITY; BOARDS; EGYPT; WOMEN; VIEWS; WORK;
D O I
10.1093/inthealth/ihab093
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Despite a growing consensus on the importance of integrating sex and gender in health research, research across disciplines continues to be conducted and reported without a gender focus. Research ethics committees (RECs) can play a particularly powerful role in identifying the gender gaps at an early stage of the development of research protocols. Their role is missing in the dialogue related to improving gender awareness and analysis in health research. A scoping review was conducted to examine the extent to which RECs discuss and consider the inclusion and analysis of sex and gender in health research and to examine the literature regarding the gender balance of RECs. The limited literature around gender and research ethics reveals the power and potential of RECs to ensure that gender dimensions are thoughtfully included in health research, and sheds light on the gaps that exist. These include an under-representation of women on RECs, a lack of awareness of the importance of gender-related aspects in health research and a paucity of gender-related training to RECs. Guidelines such as the Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines are required for RECs to strengthen the ways in which health research is gendered from conception of a research protocol to its publication.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 561
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sex and Gender Considerations in Transplant Research: A Scoping Review
    Laprise, Claudie
    Cole, Katherine
    Sridhar, Vikas Srinivasan
    Marenah, Tida
    Crimi, Cassandra
    West, Lori
    Foster, Bethany J.
    Pilote, Louise
    Sapir-Pichhadze, Ruth
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (09) : E239 - E247
  • [2] Sex and gender considerations in transplantation research: protocol for a scoping review
    Claudie Laprise
    Vikas Srinivasan Sridhar
    Lori West
    Bethany Foster
    Louise Pilote
    Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [3] Sex and gender considerations in transplantation research: protocol for a scoping review
    Laprise, Claudie
    Sridhar, Vikas Srinivasan
    West, Lori
    Foster, Bethany
    Pilote, Louise
    Sapir-Pichhadze, Ruth
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [4] The integration of sex and gender considerations in health policymaking: a scoping review
    Allison Williams
    Joonsoo Sean Lyeo
    Sophie Geffros
    Alexander Mouriopoulos
    [J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20
  • [5] The integration of sex and gender considerations in health policymaking: a scoping review
    Williams, Allison
    Lyeo, Joonsoo Sean
    Geffros, Sophie
    Mouriopoulos, Alexander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [6] Considerations for ethics review of big data health research: A scoping review
    Ienca, Marcello
    Ferretti, Agata
    Hurst, Samia
    Puhan, Milo
    Lovis, Christian
    Vayena, Effy
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [7] Gender and equity considerations in AMR research: a systematic scoping review
    Lynch, Ingrid
    Fluks, Lorenza
    Manderson, Lenore
    Isaacs, Nazeema
    Essop, Roshin
    Praphasawat, Ravikanya
    Middleton, Lyn
    Naemiratch, Bhensri
    [J]. MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2024,
  • [8] Statistical review by research ethics committees
    Williamson, P
    Hutton, JL
    Bliss, J
    Blunt, J
    Campbell, MJ
    Nicholson, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2000, 163 : 5 - 13
  • [9] Race in health research: Considerations for researchers and research ethics committees
    van Staden, W.
    Nienaber, A.
    Rossouw, T.
    Turner, A.
    Filmalter, C.
    Mercier, A. E.
    Nel, J. G.
    Bapela, S.
    Beetge, M. M.
    Blumenthal, R.
    Castelyn, C. D. V.
    de Witt, T. W.
    Dlagnekova, A. G.
    Kotze, C.
    Mangwane, J. S.
    Napoles, L.
    Sommers, R.
    Sykes, L.
    van Zyl, W. B.
    Venter, M.
    Uys, A.
    Warren, N.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS AND LAW, 2023, 16 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [10] Ethics review in research - Ethics committees are risk averse
    Minnis, HJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 710 - 711