Comparative Study of the Social Interactions of Two Differently Designed Long-Term Care Facilities for Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury

被引:0
|
作者
Brodsky, David [1 ]
Shepley, Mardelle McCuskey [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, 1413 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
关键词
brain injury; configuration; social interaction; environmental design; long-term care; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; ARCUATE FASCICULUS; OLDER-PEOPLE; ENVIRONMENT; BEHAVIOR; ADULTS; COMMUNICATION; STAFF; PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/1937586719888847
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aim: This study focused on long-term care (LTC) settings for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). The goals were (1) to assess the impact of facility configuration on social interactions between residents and staff and (2) obtain a better understanding of staff and resident perceptions of the built environment. Background: A few studies have explored the relationship between the built environment and social interaction in LTC facilities, but there is little empirical data about ABI-specific LTC facilities. Methods: A literature review was conducted on the impact of the built environment on the LTC of brain injury survivors. Via a questionnaire, staff and residents in two settings, one with patient rooms off corridors and the other with patient rooms surrounding a common space, rated the effectiveness of the built environment in promoting social interaction. Behavioral observation was conducted on 18 residents for a duration of 4 hr per resident. Results: Via questionnaires, staff rated the corridor facility as more effective in promoting social interaction, but no significant differences were found between the assessments of the two resident populations. Contrary to staff questionnaire results, residents in the open configuration facility exhibited more social behaviors. Conclusions: Building configuration may impact social interaction between staff and residents in ABI-specific LTC facilities and potentially impact staff and resident quality of life. However, configuration cannot be viewed in a vacuum; residents' physical and mental limitations, demographic information, and staff engagement must be also considered.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 98
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term Needs of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury
    Harmon, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2010, 25 (05) : 386 - 386
  • [2] Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: appropriateness of aged care facilities
    Cameron, C
    Pirozzo, S
    Tooth, L
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (03) : 261 - 264
  • [3] Life care planning and long-term care for individuals with brain injury in the UK
    Clark-Wilson, Jo
    Holloway, Mark
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 36 (03) : 289 - 300
  • [4] Supervisory relationships in long-term care facilities: A comparative case study of two facilities using complexity science
    Escrig-Pinol, Astrid
    Corazzini, Kirsten N.
    Blodgett, Meagan B.
    Chu, Charlene H.
    McGilton, Katherine S.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 27 (02) : 311 - 319
  • [5] Long Term Care Needs Following Acquired Brain Injury and Social Care Services in the UK
    Holloway, Mark
    Norman, Alyson
    BRAIN INJURY, 2019, 33 : 66 - 67
  • [6] Long-term work consequences of acquired brain injury
    van Velzen J.
    van Bennekom C.
    Huisarts en wetenschap, 2022, 65 (7) : 56 - 59
  • [7] Long-term Rehabilitation in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury
    Bender, Andreas
    Adrion, Christine
    Fischer, Luzia
    Huber, Martin
    Jawny, Kerstin
    Straube, Andreas
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 113 (38): : 634 - +
  • [8] Long-term outcomes of pediatric acquired brain injury
    Johnson, P
    Thomas-Stonell, N
    Rumney, P
    Oddson, B
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2006, 60 (02) : 205 - 206
  • [10] Memory remediation in long-term acquired brain injury: two approaches in diary training
    Ownsworth, TL
    McFarland, K
    BRAIN INJURY, 1999, 13 (08) : 605 - 626