Economic Valuation of the Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation in South Korea: Correcting for the Endogeneity Bias in Contingent Valuation

被引:5
|
作者
Choi, Ik-Chang [1 ]
Kim, Hyun No [2 ]
Shin, Hio-Jung [3 ]
Tenhunen, John [1 ]
Trung Thanh Nguyen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bayreuth, Bayreuth Ctr Ecol & Environm Res, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[2] Korea Environm Inst, Environm Policy Res Grp, Sejong 30147, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Chunchon 24341, South Korea
[4] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Econ & World Trade, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
contingent valuation method; willingness to pay; aquatic biodiversity; bivariate probit model; endogeneity bias; benefit calculation; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; STARTING POINT BIAS; EXISTENCE VALUE; RIVER-BASIN; E-MAIL; VALUES; PREFERENCE; EFFICIENCY; BENEFITS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/su9060930
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we use the Contingent Valuation (CV) method to estimate households' willingness to pay (WTP) for the aquatic ecosystem health (biodiversity) improvement. This paper extends CV studies by dealing with the endogenous effect of a proxy variable, namely the subjective experience of negative environmental quality changes. The results show that the correction for the endogeneity bias facilitates the efficiency of parameter estimation in the empirical model. The mean WTP per household accounts for around 46.8% (KRW 79.6) of the current water use charge (KRW 170 per cubic meter). The total benefit from conserving the biodiversity is around KRW 198.62 billion. We found several factors that affect households' WTP for fish biodiversity conservation, suggesting the importance of these factors in the formulation of water policies associated with aquatic biodiversity. In addition, the inefficient water management costs should be redistributed to other projects or new programs such as for the fish biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correcting for the endogeneity of pro-environment behavioral choices in contingent valuation
    Martinez-Espineira, Roberto
    Lyssenko, Nikita
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (08) : 1435 - 1439
  • [2] Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity
    Beaumont, N. J.
    Austen, M. C.
    Mangi, S. C.
    Townsend, M.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2008, 56 (03) : 386 - 396
  • [3] Valuation of environmental goods: Correcting for bias in contingent valuation studies based on willingness-to-accept
    Goldar, B
    Misra, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (01) : 150 - 156
  • [4] Measuring the economic value of green roofing in South Korea: A contingent valuation approach
    Ji, Qiang
    Lee, Hye-Jeong
    Huh, Sung-Yoon
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 261
  • [5] Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation:: the meaning of numbers
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Montes, Carlos
    Benayas, Javier
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 624 - 635
  • [6] Valuation of the Woopo Wetland in Korea: a contingent valuation study
    Kwak, Seung-Jun
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Lee, Chung-Ki
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 : 323 - 328
  • [7] Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity
    Garcia, Serce
    Harou, Patrice
    Montagne, Claire
    Stenger, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2009, 15 (1-2) : 59 - 78
  • [8] Economic valuation of a national shipping company using a contingent valuation method (CVM): The case of Korea
    Lee, Taylor Tae-Hwee
    So, Ae-rim
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2022, 135
  • [9] The conservation value of the Shinan Tidal Flat in Korea: a contingent valuation study
    Park, Sun-Young
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Kwak, Seung-Jun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (01): : 54 - 62
  • [10] BIAS IN DISCRETE RESPONSE CONTINGENT VALUATION
    KANNINEN, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (01) : 114 - 125