An at-site flood estimation method in the context of nonstationarity I. A simulation study

被引:32
|
作者
Gado, Tamer A. [1 ]
Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen [2 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Irrigat & Hydraul Engn, Tanta, Egypt
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Appl Mech, 817 Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
Nonstationary flood frequency analysis; L-moments; GEV distribution; Monte Carlo simulations; EXTREME-VALUE ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; TRENDS; VARIABILITY; SERIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.063
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The stationarity of annual flood peak records is the traditional assumption of flood frequency analysis. In some cases, however, as a result of land-use and/or climate change, this assumption is no longer valid. Therefore, new statistical models are needed to capture dynamically the change of probability density functions over time, in order to obtain reliable flood estimation. In this study, an innovative method for nonstationary flood frequency analysis was presented. Here, the new method is based on detrending the flood series and applying the L-moments along with the GEV distribution to the transformed "stationary" series (hereafter, this is called the LM-NS). The LM-NS method was assessed through a comparative study with the maximum likelihood (ML) method for the nonstationary GEV model, as well as with the stationary (S) GEV model. The comparative study, based on Monte Carlo simulations, was carried out for three nonstationary GEV models: a linear dependence of the mean on time (GEV1), a quadratic dependence of the mean on time (GEV2), and linear dependence in both the mean and log standard deviation on time (GEV11). The simulation results indicated that the LM-NS method performs better than the ML method for most of the cases studied, whereas the stationary method provides the least accurate results. An additional advantage of the LM-NS method is to avoid the numerical problems (e.g., convergence problems) that may occur with the ML method when estimating parameters for small data samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 721
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An at-site flood estimation method in the context of nonstationarity II. Statistical analysis of floods in Quebec
    Gado, Tamer A.
    Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 535 : 722 - 736
  • [2] Non-stationary approach to at-site flood frequency modelling I. Maximum likelihood estimation
    Strupczewski, WG
    Singh, VP
    Feluch, W
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 248 (1-4) : 123 - 142
  • [3] Searching for the Most Suited Distribution and Estimation Method for At-Site Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case of the Chenab River
    Bhatti, Sajjad Haider
    Umar, Muhammad
    Shongwe, Sandile Charles
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Ul Hassan, Mahmood
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2025, 34 (01): : 29 - 42
  • [4] Relevance of an at-site flood frequency analysis method for extreme events based on stochastic simulation of hourly rainfall
    Arnaud, Patrick
    Cantet, Philippe
    Aubert, Yoann
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2016, 61 (01) : 36 - 49
  • [5] Estimation of regional and at-site quantiles of extreme winds under flood index procedure
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    Ahmad, Touqeer
    Shahzad, Usman
    Ameer, Muhammad Athar
    Emam, Walid
    Tashkandy, Yusra
    Badar, Zanib
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [6] Assessment of at-site design flood estimation methods using an improved event-based design flood estimation tool
    Gericke, Ockert Jacobus
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (02):
  • [7] A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia
    Ayesha S. Rahman
    Ataur Rahman
    Mohammad A. Zaman
    Khaled Haddad
    Amimul Ahsan
    Monzur Imteaz
    Natural Hazards, 2013, 69 : 1803 - 1813
  • [8] A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia
    Rahman, Ayesha S.
    Rahman, Ataur
    Zaman, Mohammad A.
    Haddad, Khaled
    Ahsan, Amimul
    Imteaz, Monzur
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 69 (03) : 1803 - 1813
  • [9] RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. I. Method and validation
    Kay, AL
    Reynard, NS
    Jones, RG
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 318 (1-4) : 151 - 162
  • [10] Selecting the best probability distribution for at-site flood frequency analysis; a study of Torne River
    Mahmood Ul Hassan
    Omar Hayat
    Zahra Noreen
    SN Applied Sciences, 2019, 1