Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour

被引:80
|
作者
Ullman, Roz [1 ]
Smith, Lesley A. [2 ]
Burns, Ethel [2 ]
Mori, Rintaro [3 ]
Dowswell, Therese [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Collaborating Ctr Womens & Childrens Hlth, London W1T 2QA, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[3] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Global Hlth Policy, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Liverpool, Sch Reprod & Dev Med, Cochrane Pregnancy & Childbirth Grp, Div Perinatal & Reprod Med, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; FETAL HEART-RATE; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 1ST STAGE; INTRAMUSCULAR PETHIDINE; INTRAVENOUS MEPERIDINE; PROPIOMAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE; NEURAXIAL ANALGESIA; CESAREAN DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Parenteral opioids are used for pain relief in labour in many countries throughout the world. Objectives To assess the acceptability, effectiveness and safety of different types, doses and modes of administration of parenteral opioids given to women in labour. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2010) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials examining the use of intramuscular or intravenous opioids (including patient controlled analgesia) for women in labour. We looked at studies comparing an opioid with placebo or another opioid. Data collection and analysis At least two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, collected data and assessed risk of bias. Main results We included 54 studies involving more than 7000 women that compared an opioid with placebo or another opioid administered intramuscularly or intravenously. The 54 studies reported on 27 different comparisons, and for many outcomes only one study contributed data. Overall the evidence was of poor quality regarding the analgesic effect of opioids, satisfaction with analgesia, adverse effects and harm to women and babies. There were few statistically significant results. Many of the studies had small sample sizes, and low statistical power. Overall, findings indicated that parenteral opioids provided some pain relief and moderate satisfaction with analgesia in labour, although up to two-thirds of women who received opioids reported moderate or severe pain and/or poor or moderate pain relief one or two hours after administration. Opioid drugs were associated with maternal nausea, vomiting and drowsiness, although different opioid drugs were associated with different adverse effects. There was no clear evidence of adverse effects of opioids on the newborn. We did not have sufficient evidence to assess which opioid drug provided the best pain relief with the least adverse effects. Authors' conclusions Parenteral opioids provide some relief from pain in labour but are associated with adverse effects. Maternal satisfaction with opioid analgesia was largely unreported but appeared moderate at best. We did not examine the effectiveness and safety of parenteral opioids compared with other methods of pain relief in labour and this review needs to be examined alongside related Cochrane reviews. More research is needed to determine which analgesic intervention is most effective, and provides greatest satisfaction to women with acceptable adverse events for mothers and their newborns.
引用
收藏
页数:194
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour
    Smith, Lesley A.
    Burns, Ethel
    Cuthbert, Anna
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (06):
  • [2] Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review
    Bricker, L
    Lavender, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) : S94 - S109
  • [3] Time to abandon systemic opioids for pain relief in labour?
    Grant, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (10): : R7 - R8
  • [4] Intramuscular opioids for maternal pain relief in labour: a randomised controlled trial comparing pethidine with diamorphine
    Fairlie, FM
    Marshall, L
    Walker, JJ
    Elbourne, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (11): : 1181 - 1187
  • [5] Pain relief after esophagectomy:: Thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opioids
    Flisberg, P
    Törnebrandt, K
    Walther, B
    Lundberg, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2001, 15 (03) : 282 - 287
  • [6] RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOUR
    KUAH, KB
    YATES, MJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1967, 1 (7500): : 1159 - &
  • [7] Pain relief in labour
    Qureshi, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF HEALTH, 1998, 118 (03): : 194 - 195
  • [8] RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOUR
    ELAM, JE
    [J]. LANCET, 1952, 262 (JUN7): : 1163 - 1163
  • [9] RELIEF OF PAIN IN LABOUR
    BEAZLEY, JM
    LEAVER, EP
    MOREWOOD, JH
    BIRCUMSHAW, J
    [J]. LANCET, 1967, 1 (7498): : 1033 - +
  • [10] Relief of pain in labour
    Plummer, FC
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1929, 1929 (02): : 1084 - 1085