Teacher judgment accuracy;
Social accuracy model;
Academic self-concept;
Teacher expectations;
Teacher first impressions;
PERSON PERCEPTION ACCURACY;
SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT;
PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS;
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES;
ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT;
1ST IMPRESSIONS;
COGNITIVE-ABILITIES;
ASSUMED SIMILARITY;
EFFECT SIZE;
INTELLIGENCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101965
中图分类号:
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号:
0402 ;
040202 ;
摘要:
How accurate are teachers' first impressions and what moderates the degree of first impression accuracy? In previous teacher judgment accuracy research, teachers judged students who were well-acquainted to them, focusing on single traits. Here, we follow the zero-acquaintance paradigm and apply the Social Accuracy Model (SAM; Biesanz, 2010) to examine teachers' first impressions regarding students' personality profiles. Three groups of perceivers (student teachers, experienced teachers and psychology students; N = 285) rated students' (N = 10) academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation and intelligence based on brief videos. SAM analyses revealed that teachers were accurate regarding the average students' profile of characteristics (normative accuracy), but were not successful at detecting students' unique personality profiles (distinctive accuracy). Moreover, likeable students and those evaluated as more physically attractive were perceived with higher normative accuracy. Personality similarity and teaching experience were unrelated to accuracy. Implications for teacher judgment accuracy research and educational practice are discussed.
机构:
Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychol, 471 Univ Pkwy, Aiken, SC 29801 USAUniv South Carolina, Dept Psychol, 471 Univ Pkwy, Aiken, SC 29801 USA
Pazda, Adam D.
Thorstenson, Christopher A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Rochester, Dept Clin & Social Sci Psychol, 500 Joseph C Wilson Blvd, Rochester, NY 14627 USAUniv South Carolina, Dept Psychol, 471 Univ Pkwy, Aiken, SC 29801 USA