How does urban wastewater treatment affect the microbial quality of treated wastewater?

被引:24
|
作者
Lopez, Andrea [1 ]
Rodriguez-Chueca, Jorge [2 ]
Mosteo, Rosa [1 ]
Gomez, Jairo [3 ]
Rubio, E. [4 ]
Goni, Pilar [4 ]
Ormad, Maria P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Water Qual & Treatment Res Grp, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Inst Environm Sci Aragon, Maria dee Luna 3, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Ind Chem & Environm Engn, Escuela Tecn Super Ingenieros Ind, Calle Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[3] NILSA, Avda Baranain 22, Pamplona 31008, Spain
[4] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Microbiol Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Fac Med, C Domingo Miral S-N, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
Urban wastewater treatment; Microbiological quality; Natural receiving waters; Tertiary treatment; Bacteria elimination; Unitary processes; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE GENES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; TREATMENT PLANTS; BACTERIA; REMOVAL; RIVER; IDENTIFICATION; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2019.07.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The design of wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) includes facilities for the removal of suspended solids, organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorous, as required in current legislation, while removal of microorganisms is not literally emphasized. Although the different unit processes have some effect on microbial populations, disinfection is not achieved in many cases unless a specific step is included to regenerate wastewater. This study assesses the effect of the unit processes of six WWTPs that treat municipal wastewater on five microbiological parameters (total coliforms, E. coli, Enterococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), as well as their contribution to receiving waters. Bacterial concentration in the inlet of WWTPs varies from the lowest concentration of Staphylococcus aureus (10(4) CFU/100 mL), to the highest for total coliforms (10(8) CFU/100 mL), independently of the industrial activity discharging to the WWTP. Considering log bacterial removal of each step of treatment processes, trickling filters reduced 2.6 and 1.5-log Enterococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. respectively, secondary decanters achieved 2.5-log average removals and ponds reduced bacteria in a range from 1 to 2.2-log, being the processes with the highest bacteria removal, although in the case of secondary decanters this depends on design parameters such as hydraulic residence time, loads of solids, or types of previous biological treatments. The average of the bacteria concentration in the outlet of the six WWTPs was between 10(3)-10(6) CFU/100 mL. The effect of discharging these bacteria on the quality of receiving waters was assessed by analyzing microbial concentration upstream and downstream of the discharge point. In almost all cases, the bacterial concentration upstream of the discharge point was similar to downstream concentration because the effluent is rapidly diluted in the receiving river, not representing a risk to ecosystems. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 30
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coliphages as Indicators for the Microbial Quality of Treated Wastewater Effluents
    Abidelfatah Nasser
    Sivan sasi
    Yeshayahu Nitzan
    Food and Environmental Virology, 2021, 13 : 170 - 178
  • [2] Coliphages as Indicators for the Microbial Quality of Treated Wastewater Effluents
    Nasser, Abidelfatah
    Sasi, Sivan
    Nitzan, Yeshayahu
    FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 13 (02) : 170 - 178
  • [3] Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment?
    F. Gabriel Acién
    C. Gómez-Serrano
    M. M. Morales-Amaral
    J. M. Fernández-Sevilla
    E. Molina-Grima
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100 : 9013 - 9022
  • [4] Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment?
    Gabriel Acien, F.
    Gomez-Serrano, C.
    Morales-Amaral, M. M.
    Fernandez-Sevilla, J. M.
    Molina-Grima, E.
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 100 (21) : 9013 - 9022
  • [5] MICROBIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
    Anielak, Anna M.
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2020, 99 (02): : 190 - 191
  • [6] Utilization of Microalgae for Urban Wastewater Treatment and Valorization of Treated Wastewater and Biomass for Biofertilizer Applications
    Khan, Shoyeb
    Thaher, Mahmoud
    Abdulquadir, Mohammed
    Faisal, Mohammed
    Mehariya, Sanjeet
    Al-Najjar, Mohammad A. A.
    Al-Jabri, Hareb
    Das, Probir
    Capodaglio, Andrea G.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [7] How does the entering of copper nanoparticles into biological wastewater treatment system affect sludge treatment for VFA production
    Chen, Hong
    Chen, Yinguang
    Zheng, Xiong
    Li, Xiang
    Luo, Jingyang
    WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 63 : 125 - 134
  • [8] How to dispose of treated wastewater?
    Chemical and Engineering News, 2023, 101 (31): : 23 - 25
  • [9] Wastewater quality index (WWQI) as an assessment tool of treated wastewater quality for agriculture: a case of North Wastewater Treatment Plant effluent of Isfahan
    Zahra Jamshidzadeh
    Majid Tavangari Barzi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 7366 - 7378
  • [10] Wastewater quality index (WWQI) as an assessment tool of treated wastewater quality for agriculture: a case of North Wastewater Treatment Plant effluent of Isfahan
    Jamshidzadeh, Zahra
    Tavangari Barzi, Majid
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (07) : 7366 - 7378