Comprehensive evaluation of logistics enterprise competitiveness based on SEM model

被引:7
|
作者
Yang Yaxu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Baoding, Peoples R China
关键词
SEM model; logistics enterprise; competitiveness; comprehensive evaluation; REVERSE LOGISTICS; NETWORK DESIGN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-189486
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The loose logistics market, the weak value-added service capabilities of enterprises, and the backward construction and operation of logistics networks have led to high logistics costs and low efficiency in some enterprises. In order to improve the comprehensive evaluation effect of enterprise logistics enterprise competitiveness, this paper builds a comprehensive evaluation model of logistics enterprise competitiveness based on SEM model based on machine learning technology. Moreover, in order to more accurately grasp the law of customer logistics mode selection behavior, this paper adds the adaptive value of the latent variables of the logistics mode service characteristics obtained through the SEM model to the utility function of the logistics mode to obtain the SEM-NL integrated model. In addition, starting from the analysis of the key factors affecting the competitiveness of enterprise logistics, this paper constructs an evaluation model of enterprise logistics competitiveness, and analyzes and studies the comprehensive competitiveness of enterprise logistics through two aspects of logistics actual competitiveness and logistics future development potential. The research results show that the model constructed in this paper is suitable for the comprehensive evaluation of the competitiveness of logistics enterprises.
引用
收藏
页码:6469 / 6479
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Logistics Enterprise Based on Niche
    Zhang Lingrong
    Li Yonglin
    Ma Yuanjun
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING IN CHINA: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONIC BUSINESS AND INFORMATION SYSTEM, 2010, : 138 - 142
  • [2] Combinational Evaluation on the Competitiveness of Logistics Enterprise
    Li, Weidong
    [J]. IEEE/SOLI'2008: PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE OPERATIONS AND LOGISTICS, AND INFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 2866 - 2871
  • [3] Comprehensive evaluation of enterprise technological competitiveness
    Zhou, ST
    Zhu, AM
    Yu, LJ
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, 2005, : 9 - 11
  • [4] Research on Evaluation of the Modern Logistics Enterprise Technological Innovation Ability Based on SEM
    Wang, Chengjun
    Gou, Minmin
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 457-458 : 1419 - 1422
  • [5] Comprehensive Evaluation of the Competitiveness of the Beibu Gulf Port Logistics
    Wang Junli
    Liao Zhigao
    Wang Lunyue
    [J]. STATISTIC APPLICATION IN MODERN SOCIETY, 2015, : 250 - 256
  • [6] Research on comprehensive evaluation of enterprise's brand competitiveness based-on internet
    Limao Yang
    Xuan Tang
    [J]. Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 3380 - 3387
  • [7] IMPORTANCE OF LOGISTICS CENTRES FOR ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVENESS
    Vlcek, Petr
    Wilczkova, Marta
    [J]. HRADECKE EKONOMICKE DNY 2014: EKONOMICKY ROZVOJ A MANAGEMENT REGIONU, DIL III, 2014, : 397 - 403
  • [8] Research on the Comprehensive Evaluation in Enterprise's Logistics System Based on Entropy Method
    Zhang, Zhiqiao
    Guo, Qin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 916 - +
  • [9] Brand Risk Evaluation for Logistics Enterprise Based on DHGF Model
    Peng Jun
    Liu Qing
    Yang Jufeng
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 2, 2010, : 58 - 63
  • [10] Logistics Enterprise Evaluation Model Based On Fuzzy Clustering Analysis
    Fu, Pei-hua
    Yin, Hong-bo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED PHYSICS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING 2012, PT C, 2012, 24 : 1583 - 1587